TY - JOUR
T1 - Synthetic fuel production by indirect coal liquefaction
AU - Larson, Eric D.
AU - Tingjin, Ren
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Robert Williams and Robert Moore for helpful discussions during the preparation of this paper, Poul Hojlund-Nielsen (Haldor Topsoe) and Han Yizhuo (Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for helpful reviews of an early draft, and Cathy Kunkel for assistance with graphics. For financial support, the authors thank the Task Force on Energy Strategies and Technologies of the CCICED, the Blue Moon Fund, and the Hewlett Foundation. The authors also gratefully acknowledge support from BP (via the ‘‘Clean Energy, Facing the Future’’ program at Tsinghua University) and BP/Ford (via the ‘‘Carbon Mitigation Initiative’’ at Princeton University).
PY - 2003/12
Y1 - 2003/12
N2 - This paper reports detailed process designs and cost assessments for production of clean liquid fuels (methanol and dimethyl ether) by indirect coal liquefaction (ICL). Gasification of coal produces a synthesis gas that can be converted to liquid fuel by synthesis over appropriate catalysts. Recycling of unconverted synthesis gas back to the synthesis reactor enables a larger fraction of the coal energy to be converted to liquid fuel. Passing synthesis gas once over the synthesis catalyst, with unconverted synthesis gas used to generate electricity in a gas turbine combined cycle, leads to less liquid fuel production, but provides for a significant second revenue stream from sale of electricity. Recently-developed liquid-phase synthesis reactors are especially attractive for "once-through" processing. Both "recycle" and "once-through" plant configurations are evaluated in this paper. Because synthesis catalysts are poisoned by sulfur, essentially all sulfur must be removed upstream. Upstream removal of CO2 from the synthesis gas is also desirable to maximize synthesis productivity, and it provides an opportunity for partial decarbonization of the process, whereby the removed CO2 can be captured for underground storage. The analysis here suggests that co-capture and co-storage of CO2 and H2S (if this is proven technically feasible) could have important favorable impacts in some cases on liquid fuel production costs. Furthermore, the life-cycle CO2 emissions from production and use of fuels made by ICL would be lower than with production and use of petroleum-derived transportation fuels. If CO2 is not captured at ICL facilities, lifecycle CO2 emissions to the atmosphere would be considerably higher than lifecycle emissions with petroleum-derived fuels.
AB - This paper reports detailed process designs and cost assessments for production of clean liquid fuels (methanol and dimethyl ether) by indirect coal liquefaction (ICL). Gasification of coal produces a synthesis gas that can be converted to liquid fuel by synthesis over appropriate catalysts. Recycling of unconverted synthesis gas back to the synthesis reactor enables a larger fraction of the coal energy to be converted to liquid fuel. Passing synthesis gas once over the synthesis catalyst, with unconverted synthesis gas used to generate electricity in a gas turbine combined cycle, leads to less liquid fuel production, but provides for a significant second revenue stream from sale of electricity. Recently-developed liquid-phase synthesis reactors are especially attractive for "once-through" processing. Both "recycle" and "once-through" plant configurations are evaluated in this paper. Because synthesis catalysts are poisoned by sulfur, essentially all sulfur must be removed upstream. Upstream removal of CO2 from the synthesis gas is also desirable to maximize synthesis productivity, and it provides an opportunity for partial decarbonization of the process, whereby the removed CO2 can be captured for underground storage. The analysis here suggests that co-capture and co-storage of CO2 and H2S (if this is proven technically feasible) could have important favorable impacts in some cases on liquid fuel production costs. Furthermore, the life-cycle CO2 emissions from production and use of fuels made by ICL would be lower than with production and use of petroleum-derived transportation fuels. If CO2 is not captured at ICL facilities, lifecycle CO2 emissions to the atmosphere would be considerably higher than lifecycle emissions with petroleum-derived fuels.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24644453356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24644453356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60381-6
DO - 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60381-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:24644453356
SN - 0973-0826
VL - 7
SP - 79
EP - 102
JO - Energy for Sustainable Development
JF - Energy for Sustainable Development
IS - 4
ER -