TY - JOUR
T1 - Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies
T2 - "sTROBE-RDS" statement
AU - White, Richard G.
AU - Hakim, Avi J.
AU - Salganik, Matthew J.
AU - Spiller, Michael W.
AU - Johnston, Lisa G.
AU - Kerr, Ligia
AU - Kendall, Carl
AU - Drake, Amy
AU - Wilson, David
AU - Orroth, Kate
AU - Egger, Matthias
AU - Hladik, Wolfgang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - Objectives Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a new data collection methodology used to estimate characteristics of hard-to-reach groups, such as the HIV prevalence in drug users. Many national public health systems and international organizations rely on RDS data. However, RDS reporting quality and available reporting guidelines are inadequate. We carried out a systematic review of RDS studies and present Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for RDS Studies (STROBE-RDS), a checklist of essential items to present in RDS publications, justified by an explanation and elaboration document. Study Design and Setting We searched the MEDLINE (1970-2013), EMBASE (1974-2013), and Global Health (1910-2013) databases to assess the number and geographical distribution of published RDS studies. STROBE-RDS was developed based on STROBE guidelines, following Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines. Results RDS has been used in over 460 studies from 69 countries, including the USA (151 studies), China (70), and India (32). STROBE-RDS includes modifications to 12 of the 22 items on the STROBE checklist. The two key areas that required modification concerned the selection of participants and statistical analysis of the sample. Conclusion STROBE-RDS seeks to enhance the transparency and utility of research using RDS. If widely adopted, STROBE-RDS should improve global infectious diseases public health decision making.
AB - Objectives Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a new data collection methodology used to estimate characteristics of hard-to-reach groups, such as the HIV prevalence in drug users. Many national public health systems and international organizations rely on RDS data. However, RDS reporting quality and available reporting guidelines are inadequate. We carried out a systematic review of RDS studies and present Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for RDS Studies (STROBE-RDS), a checklist of essential items to present in RDS publications, justified by an explanation and elaboration document. Study Design and Setting We searched the MEDLINE (1970-2013), EMBASE (1974-2013), and Global Health (1910-2013) databases to assess the number and geographical distribution of published RDS studies. STROBE-RDS was developed based on STROBE guidelines, following Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines. Results RDS has been used in over 460 studies from 69 countries, including the USA (151 studies), China (70), and India (32). STROBE-RDS includes modifications to 12 of the 22 items on the STROBE checklist. The two key areas that required modification concerned the selection of participants and statistical analysis of the sample. Conclusion STROBE-RDS seeks to enhance the transparency and utility of research using RDS. If widely adopted, STROBE-RDS should improve global infectious diseases public health decision making.
KW - Biomedical research/methods
KW - Cross-sectional studies
KW - Epidemiologic research design
KW - Epidemiologic studies
KW - Guidelines as topic
KW - Guidelines as topic/standards
KW - Humans
KW - Observation/methods
KW - Practice guidelines as topic
KW - Publishing/standards
KW - Research design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948715155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948715155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26112433
AN - SCOPUS:84948715155
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 68
SP - 1463
EP - 1471
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
IS - 12
ER -