Stare decisis and judicial log-rolls: a gains-from-trade model

Charles M. Cameron, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Giri Parameswaran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


The practice of horizontal stare decisis requires that judges occasionally decide cases “incorrectly.” What sustains this practice? Given a heterogeneous bench, we show that the increasing differences in dispositional value property of preferences generates gains when judges trade dispositions over the case-space. These gains are fully realized by implementing a compromise rule—stare decisis. Absent commitment, we provide conditions that sustain the compromise in a repeated game. When complete compromises become unsustainable, partial compromises still avail. Moreover, judges may prefer to implement partial compromises even when perfect ones are sustainable. Thus, stare decisis is consistent with a partially settled, partially contested legal doctrine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-531
Number of pages27
JournalRAND Journal of Economics
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Stare decisis and judicial log-rolls: a gains-from-trade model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this