Spitzer or neoclassical resistivity: A comparison between measured and model poloidal field profiles on PBX-M

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Direct measurements of the radial profile of the magnetic field line pitch on PBX-M [Phys. Fluids B 2, 1271 (1990)], coupled with model predictions of these profiles allow a critical comparison with the Spitzer and neoclassical models of plasma parallel resistivity. The measurements of the magnetic field line pitch are made by motional Stark effect polarimetry, while the model profiles are determined by solving the poloidal field diffusion equation in the TRANSP transport code using measured plasma profiles and assuming either Spitzer or neoclassical resistivity. The measured field pitch profiles were available for only seven cases, and the model profiles were distinguishable from each other in only three of those cases due to finite resistive diffusion times. The data in two of these three were best matched by the Spitzer model, especially in the inner-half of the plasma. Portions of the measured pitch profiles for these two cases and the full profiles for other cases, however, departed significantly from both the Spitzer and neoclassical models, indicating a plasma resistivity profile different from either model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-658
Number of pages8
JournalPhysics of Fluids B
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computational Mechanics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • General Physics and Astronomy
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spitzer or neoclassical resistivity: A comparison between measured and model poloidal field profiles on PBX-M'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this