Abstract
The air-water and graphene-water interfaces represent quintessential examples of the liquid-gas and liquid-solid boundaries, respectively. While the sum-frequency generation (SFG) spectra of these interfaces show similarities, a consensus on their signals and interpretations has yet to be reached. Leveraging deep learning, we computed first-principles SFG spectra for both systems, addressing experimental discrepancies. Our findings reveal that similarities in SFG signals do not translate into comparable interfacial microscopic properties. Instead, graphene-water and air-water interfaces exhibit fundamental differences in SFG-active thicknesses, hydrogen-bonding networks, and surface dynamics. These distinctions underscore roughness suppression and electronic interactions present at the solid-liquid interface but absent at the gas-liquid interface.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 056202 |
| Journal | Physical review letters |
| Volume | 136 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 6 2026 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Physics and Astronomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Spectral Similarity Masks Structural Diversity at Hydrophobic Water Interfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver