Abstract
This paper responds to the common assumption in much recent ethnomusicology that today music is more accessible, ubiquitous and mobile than ever before. In particular, I argue that this assumption runs aground when confronted with sonic practices in South Africa. Based on fieldwork with electronic musicians in Johannesburg and its surrounding areas, I ask how music is practiced and experienced in a context where musical equipment and storage devices constantly break down and where people are largely immobile. I focus on four factors: the physical layout of urban spaces; the immanence of crime and theft; the breakdown of musical equipment; and the interruption of information storage and transfer. By examining these factors, I elucidate the ways in which breakdown, obduracy and failure have generative as well as negative effects on music production and experience.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 102-123 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Ethnomusicology Forum |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Anthropology
- Music
Keywords
- Circulation
- Electronic music
- Failure
- Obduracy
- Soweto
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sound and circulation: Immobility and obduracy in South African electronic music'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver