TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulating black hole imposters
AU - Pretorius, Frans
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - I briefly describe motivation for, and the current state of research into understanding the structure and dynamics of black hole “imposters”: objects that could be misidentified as Kerr black holes given the current precision of LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave observations, or EHT accretion disk measurements. I use the term “weak imposter” to describe an object which is a black hole, i.e. it has an event horizon, but whose structure and dynamics is governed by a modified gravity theory. At the other end of the spectrum are “strong imposters”: hypothetical horizonless, compact objects conjectured to form instead of black holes during gravitational collapse. To discover or rule-out imposters will require a quantitative understanding of their merger dynamics. This is hampered at present by a dearth of well-posed theoretical frameworks to describe imposters beyond perturbations of Kerr black holes and their general relativistic binary dynamics. That so little is known about non-perturbative modifications to dynamical, strongfield gravity is, I argue, due to a lamppost effect.
AB - I briefly describe motivation for, and the current state of research into understanding the structure and dynamics of black hole “imposters”: objects that could be misidentified as Kerr black holes given the current precision of LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave observations, or EHT accretion disk measurements. I use the term “weak imposter” to describe an object which is a black hole, i.e. it has an event horizon, but whose structure and dynamics is governed by a modified gravity theory. At the other end of the spectrum are “strong imposters”: hypothetical horizonless, compact objects conjectured to form instead of black holes during gravitational collapse. To discover or rule-out imposters will require a quantitative understanding of their merger dynamics. This is hampered at present by a dearth of well-posed theoretical frameworks to describe imposters beyond perturbations of Kerr black holes and their general relativistic binary dynamics. That so little is known about non-perturbative modifications to dynamical, strongfield gravity is, I argue, due to a lamppost effect.
KW - Black holes
KW - Gravitational waves
KW - Testing general relativity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85219741982
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219741982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10714-025-03354-9
DO - 10.1007/s10714-025-03354-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85219741982
SN - 0001-7701
VL - 57
JO - General Relativity and Gravitation
JF - General Relativity and Gravitation
IS - 1
M1 - 24
ER -