Abstract
Presidents have substantial unilateral policymaking powers in the United States despite constitutional provisions for checks and balances. I study how electoral concerns encourage o ceholders to exercise these powers, using a formal model in which unilateral policymaking skill varies across o ceholders and is unknown to voters. Undesirable unilateral action is unavoidable in equilibrium under broad conditions. This perverse behavior occurs when the incumbent acts unilaterally to show o policymaking skill even though unilateral action is inferior policy. Showing o is driven by electoral motivations and occurs because unilateral action is important for re-election. I also characterize conditions under which the incumbent acts unilaterally in equilibrium if and only if it improves voter welfare.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 241-267 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Critical Finance Review |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Finance
Keywords
- Electoral accountability
- Political economy
- Presidency
- Unilateral policymaking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Showing o: Promise and peril in unilateral policymaking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver