Sex and Race: Are Black Candidates More Likely to be Disadvantaged by Sex Scandals?

Adam J. Berinsky, Vincent L. Hutchings, Tali Mendelberg, Lee Shaker, Nicholas A. Valentino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations


A growing body of work suggests that exposure to subtle racial cues prompts white voters to penalize black candidates, and that the effects of these cues may influence outcomes indirectly via perceptions of candidate ideology. We test hypotheses related to these ideas using two experiments based on national samples. In one experiment, we manipulated the race of a candidate (Barack Obama vs. John Edwards) accused of sexual impropriety. We found that while both candidates suffered from the accusation, the scandal led respondents to view Obama as more liberal than Edwards, especially among resentful and engaged whites. Second, overall evaluations of Obama declined more sharply than for Edwards. In the other experiment, we manipulated the explicitness of the scandal, and found that implicit cues were more damaging for Obama than explicit ones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-202
Number of pages24
JournalPolitical Behavior
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science


  • Race
  • Stereotypes
  • Voting behavior


Dive into the research topics of 'Sex and Race: Are Black Candidates More Likely to be Disadvantaged by Sex Scandals?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this