TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensitivity of sequestration efficiency to mixing processes in the global ocean
AU - Mignone, B. K.
AU - Sarmiento, Jorge Louis
AU - Slater, R. D.
AU - Gnanadesikan, A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by BP Amoco and the Ford Motor Company under the Princeton Carbon Mitigation Initiative. BKM acknowledges additional generous support from the National Science Foundation (NSF grant number DGE-9972930). We thank J. Orr and all of the OCMIP-2 participants for graciously sharing their model results. BKM also thanks J. Orr, K. Caldeira, K. Matsumoto and J. Greenblatt for useful discussions and T. Holloway for helpful comments on the manuscript.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - A number of large-scale sequestration strategies have been considered to help mitigate rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Here, we use an ocean general circulation model (OGCM) to evaluate the efficiency of one such strategy currently receiving much attention, the direct injection of liquid CO2 into selected regions of the abyssal ocean. We find that currents typically transport the injected plumes quite far before they are able to return to the surface and release CO2 through air-sea gas exchange. When injected at sufficient depth (well within or below the main thermocline), most of the injected CO2 outgasses in high latitudes (mainly in the Southern Ocean) where vertical exchange is most favored. Virtually all OGCMs that have performed similar simulations confirm these global patterns, but regional differences are significant, leading efficiency estimates to vary widely among models even when identical protocols are followed. In this paper, we make a first attempt at reconciling some of these differences by performing a sensitivity analysis in one OGCM, the Princeton Modular Ocean Model. Using techniques we have developed to maintain both the modeled density structure and the absolute magnitude of the overturning circulation while varying important mixing parameters, we estimate the sensitivity of sequestration efficiency to the magnitude of vertical exchange within the low-latitude pycnocline. Combining these model results with available tracer data permits us to narrow the range of model behavior, which in turn places important constraints on sequestration efficiency.
AB - A number of large-scale sequestration strategies have been considered to help mitigate rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Here, we use an ocean general circulation model (OGCM) to evaluate the efficiency of one such strategy currently receiving much attention, the direct injection of liquid CO2 into selected regions of the abyssal ocean. We find that currents typically transport the injected plumes quite far before they are able to return to the surface and release CO2 through air-sea gas exchange. When injected at sufficient depth (well within or below the main thermocline), most of the injected CO2 outgasses in high latitudes (mainly in the Southern Ocean) where vertical exchange is most favored. Virtually all OGCMs that have performed similar simulations confirm these global patterns, but regional differences are significant, leading efficiency estimates to vary widely among models even when identical protocols are followed. In this paper, we make a first attempt at reconciling some of these differences by performing a sensitivity analysis in one OGCM, the Princeton Modular Ocean Model. Using techniques we have developed to maintain both the modeled density structure and the absolute magnitude of the overturning circulation while varying important mixing parameters, we estimate the sensitivity of sequestration efficiency to the magnitude of vertical exchange within the low-latitude pycnocline. Combining these model results with available tracer data permits us to narrow the range of model behavior, which in turn places important constraints on sequestration efficiency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642536703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642536703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.080
DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.080
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:2642536703
SN - 0360-5442
VL - 29
SP - 1467
EP - 1478
JO - Energy
JF - Energy
IS - 9-10
ER -