Secrecy, flagging, and paranoia: Adoption criteria in encrypted e-mail

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

We consider the social context behind users' decisions about whether and when to encrypt email, interviewing a sample of users from an organization whose mission requires secrecy. Interview participants varied in their level of technical sophistication and in their involvement with secrets. We found that users saw universal, routine use of encryption as paranoid. Encryption flagged a message not only as confidential but also as urgent, so users found the encryption of mundane messages annoying. In general, decisions about encryption were driven not just by technical issues such as usability, but also by social factors. We argue that understanding these social factors is necessary to guide the design of encryption technologies that can be more widely adopted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCHI 2006
Subtitle of host publicationConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings SIGCHI
Pages591-600
Number of pages10
StatePublished - Jul 17 2006
EventCHI 2006: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Montreal, QC, Canada
Duration: Apr 22 2006Apr 27 2006

Publication series

NameConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings
Volume1

Other

OtherCHI 2006: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
CountryCanada
CityMontreal, QC
Period4/22/064/27/06

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Keywords

  • Activism
  • Encrypted e-mail
  • Extended case method
  • Security

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Secrecy, flagging, and paranoia: Adoption criteria in encrypted e-mail'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this