TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety standards for the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms
AU - Levin, Simon A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This publication is ERC-I59 of the Ecosystems Research Center, and was supported in part by the US Environmental Protection Agency, Cooperative Agreement CR8 I2685 with Cornell University. Additional support was provided by National Science Foundation grant DMS-8406472 to the author. The work and conclusions published herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions, policies, or recommendations of the funding agencies. Thanks are extended to Clifford Gabriel for valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper, and Arthur Kelman for always illuminating discussions and for calling my attention to the Thompson paper.
PY - 1988/4
Y1 - 1988/4
N2 - The use of genetically engineered organisms holds considerable promise for environmental management and other purposes, provided appropriate safety standards are established and observed. The problem with much of the debate concerning deliberate releases has been the difficulty in getting down to specifics. Examples can be advanced that give cause for concern, or that demonstrate that introductions can be carried out safely; but none of these has the generality to apply to all cases. Generic arguments for and agaisnt the safety of introductions must be rejected, and replaced by consideration of the properties of individual introductions. It is the properties of the introduced organism in relation to the environment that must receive attention, not the method by which the genetic modification was achieved. One must go beyond discussions that lump all possible applications together, and develop criteria that associate individual cases with the risk categories most appropriate to them.
AB - The use of genetically engineered organisms holds considerable promise for environmental management and other purposes, provided appropriate safety standards are established and observed. The problem with much of the debate concerning deliberate releases has been the difficulty in getting down to specifics. Examples can be advanced that give cause for concern, or that demonstrate that introductions can be carried out safely; but none of these has the generality to apply to all cases. Generic arguments for and agaisnt the safety of introductions must be rejected, and replaced by consideration of the properties of individual introductions. It is the properties of the introduced organism in relation to the environment that must receive attention, not the method by which the genetic modification was achieved. One must go beyond discussions that lump all possible applications together, and develop criteria that associate individual cases with the risk categories most appropriate to them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243382613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243382613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90142-5
DO - 10.1016/0169-5347(88)90142-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 21227134
AN - SCOPUS:4243382613
SN - 0169-5347
VL - 3
SP - S47-S49
JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution
IS - 4
ER -