TY - JOUR
T1 - Robustness of solutions to a benchmark control problem
AU - Stengel, Robert F.
AU - Marrisont, Christopher I.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research has been supported by the Army Research Office under Contract DAAL03-89-K-0092 and the FAA and NASA under Grant NGL 31-001-252. We gratefully acknowledge the nominal settling time (4/fo>w) evaluations provided by Bong Wie, Arizona State University.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1992
Y1 - 1992
N2 - The robustness of 10 solutions to a benchmark control design problem presented at the 1990 American Control Conference has been evaluated. The 10 controllers have second- to eighth-order transfer functions and have been designed using several different methods, including H∞ optimization, loop-transfer recovery, imaginary-axis shifting, constrained optimization, structured covariance, game theory, and the internal model principle. Stochastic robustness analysis quantifies the controllers' stability and performance robustness with structured uncertainties in up to six system parameters. The analysis provides insights into system response that are not readily derived from other robustness criteria and provides a common ground for judging controllers produced by alternative methods. One important conclusion is that gain and phase margins are not reliable indicators of the probability of instability. Furthermore, parameter variations actually may improve the likelihood of achieving selected performance metrics, as demonstrated by results for the probability of settling-time exceedance.
AB - The robustness of 10 solutions to a benchmark control design problem presented at the 1990 American Control Conference has been evaluated. The 10 controllers have second- to eighth-order transfer functions and have been designed using several different methods, including H∞ optimization, loop-transfer recovery, imaginary-axis shifting, constrained optimization, structured covariance, game theory, and the internal model principle. Stochastic robustness analysis quantifies the controllers' stability and performance robustness with structured uncertainties in up to six system parameters. The analysis provides insights into system response that are not readily derived from other robustness criteria and provides a common ground for judging controllers produced by alternative methods. One important conclusion is that gain and phase margins are not reliable indicators of the probability of instability. Furthermore, parameter variations actually may improve the likelihood of achieving selected performance metrics, as demonstrated by results for the probability of settling-time exceedance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026928024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026928024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/3.20950
DO - 10.2514/3.20950
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0026928024
SN - 0731-5090
VL - 15
SP - 1060
EP - 1067
JO - Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
JF - Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics
IS - 5
ER -