Abstract
A significant challenge in training large language models (LLMs) as effective assistants is aligning them with human preferences. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a promising solution. However, our understanding of RLHF is often limited to initial design choices. This article analyzes RLHF through reinforcement learning principles, focusing on the reward model. It examines modeling choices and function approximation caveats, highlighting assumptions about reward expressivity and revealing limitations like incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and sparse feedback. A categorical review of current literature provides insights for researchers to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing methods.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 53 |
| Journal | ACM Computing Surveys |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 10 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Theoretical Computer Science
- General Computer Science
Keywords
- Preference learning
- function approximation
- survey
- taxonomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver