TY - JOUR
T1 - Review essay the jewish roots of the modern republic
AU - Gregory, Eric
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - A concise study of sixteenth-and seventeenth-century Protestant Hebraica does not immediately suggest a provocative contribution to contemporary debates about secularization, religion, and politics. But that is what Eric Nelson's learned yet accessible book about the Jewish sources of early modern republicanism provides. According to Nelson, Professor of Government at Harvard University, the distinctive authority of the Hebrew Republic made possible the Protestant development of three central ideas: republican liberty, care for equality, and religious toleration. Nelson's rehabilitation of the neglected Christian Hebraism of the late Renaissance and Reformation seeks to challenge historiographies which characterize modern political thought in terms of a rationalist independence from theology. These dominant narratives roughly describe a transition from political theology to political science that excludes religious conviction from political argument. Nelson invokes (but does not engage) Mark Lilla's description of "the Great Separation" of religion and politics as one expression of this threshold of disenchantment. He also associates this narrative with figures as diverse as Hans Blumenberg, Leo Strauss, C. B. Macpherson, Michael Oakeshott, John Rawls, and Jonathan Israel. The book, therefore, contributes to scholarship that complicates the primacy of the "Enlightenment" origins and character of Western politics. It also raises complex questions about our relation to these origins. Much like Nelson's own argument about the way Jewish sources helped reorganize accepted categories, his book opens new spaces for scholarly conversation across multiple fields of study. This review briefly raises normative implications of Nelson's book for scholars of theology, ethics, and religious studies. I examine stronger and weaker versions of Nelson's historical narrative as well as his gestures at their implications.
AB - A concise study of sixteenth-and seventeenth-century Protestant Hebraica does not immediately suggest a provocative contribution to contemporary debates about secularization, religion, and politics. But that is what Eric Nelson's learned yet accessible book about the Jewish sources of early modern republicanism provides. According to Nelson, Professor of Government at Harvard University, the distinctive authority of the Hebrew Republic made possible the Protestant development of three central ideas: republican liberty, care for equality, and religious toleration. Nelson's rehabilitation of the neglected Christian Hebraism of the late Renaissance and Reformation seeks to challenge historiographies which characterize modern political thought in terms of a rationalist independence from theology. These dominant narratives roughly describe a transition from political theology to political science that excludes religious conviction from political argument. Nelson invokes (but does not engage) Mark Lilla's description of "the Great Separation" of religion and politics as one expression of this threshold of disenchantment. He also associates this narrative with figures as diverse as Hans Blumenberg, Leo Strauss, C. B. Macpherson, Michael Oakeshott, John Rawls, and Jonathan Israel. The book, therefore, contributes to scholarship that complicates the primacy of the "Enlightenment" origins and character of Western politics. It also raises complex questions about our relation to these origins. Much like Nelson's own argument about the way Jewish sources helped reorganize accepted categories, his book opens new spaces for scholarly conversation across multiple fields of study. This review briefly raises normative implications of Nelson's book for scholars of theology, ethics, and religious studies. I examine stronger and weaker versions of Nelson's historical narrative as well as his gestures at their implications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864136770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864136770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0017816012000144
DO - 10.1017/S0017816012000144
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84864136770
SN - 0017-8160
VL - 105
SP - 372
EP - 380
JO - Harvard Theological Review
JF - Harvard Theological Review
IS - 3
ER -