Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Revealing Measles Outbreak Risk with a Nested Immunoglobulin G Serosurvey in Madagascar

  • Amy K. Winter
  • , Amy P. Wesolowski
  • , Keitly J. Mensah
  • , Miora Bruna Ramamonjiharisoa
  • , Andrianmasina Herivelo Randriamanantena
  • , Richter Razafindratsimandresy
  • , Simon Cauchemez
  • , Justin Lessler
  • , Matt J. Ferrari
  • , C. Jess E. Metcalf
  • , Jean Michel Héraud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Madagascar reports few measles cases annually and high vaccination campaign coverage. However, the underlying age profile of immunity and risk of a measles outbreak is unknown. We conducted a nested serological survey, testing 1,005 serum samples (collected between November 2013 and December 2015 via Madagascar's febrile rash surveillance system) for measles immunoglobulin G antibody titers. We directly estimated the age profile of immunity and compared these estimates with indirect estimates based on a birth cohort model of vaccination coverage and natural infection. Combining these estimates of the age profile of immunity in the population with an age-structured model of transmission, we further predicted the risk of a measles outbreak and the impact of mitigation strategies designed around supplementary immunization activities. The direct and indirect estimates of age-specific seroprevalence show that current measles susceptibility is over 10%, and modeling suggests that Madagascar may be at risk of a major measles epidemic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2219-2226
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume187
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology

Keywords

  • Madagascar
  • measles
  • rubella
  • serological survey
  • surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revealing Measles Outbreak Risk with a Nested Immunoglobulin G Serosurvey in Madagascar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this