Rethinking Black Speculative Fiction: The Example of Charles Chesnutt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay draws upon recent developments in histories of finance and Black studies to argue for an expanded consideration of late nineteenth-century speculative fiction. In recent decades, speculation has emerged as a foundational methodology, critical framework, and literary genre in African American literary studies and Black studies. Yet, within this body of scholarship, speculative fiction is most often associated with anti-realist modes that imagine alternate futures while speculative reading and research methods double as a critique of our political and disciplinary limits. Through a close reading of Charles Chesnutt’s 1901 novel The Marrow of Tradition, this essay considers how speculation’s late nineteenth-century instruments and logics determine the novel’s political horizons and narrative structure. By attending to the financial workings of late nineteenth-century novels that might seem to strain against the bounds of either genre fiction or speculative research methods, this essay argues that we can begin to see how a work like Chesnutt’s interrogates a particularly postbellum outlook on the future, one in which the terms of financial speculation can only imagine a future that is an intensification of the past.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe New Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages265-280
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781009296748
ISBN (Print)9781009296731
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Keywords

  • African American
  • Charles Chesnutt
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Novel
  • Postbellum
  • Racial capitalism
  • Speculation
  • Speculative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Black Speculative Fiction: The Example of Charles Chesnutt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this