Abstract
Sivan et al. claim that the methods used to distinguish thermal from hot carrier effects in our recent report are inaccurate and that our data can be explained by a purely thermal mechanism with a fixed activation energy. This conclusion is invalid, because they substantially misinterpret the emissivity of the photocatalyst and assume a linear intensity–dependent temperature in their model that is unrealistic.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | eaaw9545 |
Journal | Science |
Volume | 364 |
Issue number | 6439 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 3 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General