Response to comment on "poverty impedes cognitive function"

Anandi Mani; Sendhil Mullainathan; Eldar Shafir; Jiaying Zhao

doi:10.1126/science.1246799

Response to comment on "poverty impedes cognitive function"

Anandi Mani
, Sendhil Mullainathan
, Eldar Shafir
, Jiaying Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Wicherts and Scholten criticized our study on statistical and psychometric grounds. We show that (i) using a continuous income variable, the interaction between income, and experimental manipulation remains reliable across our experiments; (ii) our results in the cognitive control task do not appear driven by ceiling effects; and (iii) our observed post-harvest improvement is robust to the presence of learning.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1169e
Journal	Science
Volume	342
Issue number	6163
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246799
State	Published - 2013
Externally published	Yes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General

Access to Document

10.1126/science.1246799

Cite this

@article{b590b22d1be743a4827dfdabdb7c3800,

title = "Response to comment on {"}poverty impedes cognitive function{"}",

abstract = "Wicherts and Scholten criticized our study on statistical and psychometric grounds. We show that (i) using a continuous income variable, the interaction between income, and experimental manipulation remains reliable across our experiments; (ii) our results in the cognitive control task do not appear driven by ceiling effects; and (iii) our observed post-harvest improvement is robust to the presence of learning.",

author = "Anandi Mani and Sendhil Mullainathan and Eldar Shafir and Jiaying Zhao",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1126/science.1246799",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "342",

pages = "1169e",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "6163",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to comment on "poverty impedes cognitive function"

AU - Mani, Anandi

AU - Mullainathan, Sendhil

AU - Shafir, Eldar

AU - Zhao, Jiaying

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Wicherts and Scholten criticized our study on statistical and psychometric grounds. We show that (i) using a continuous income variable, the interaction between income, and experimental manipulation remains reliable across our experiments; (ii) our results in the cognitive control task do not appear driven by ceiling effects; and (iii) our observed post-harvest improvement is robust to the presence of learning.

AB - Wicherts and Scholten criticized our study on statistical and psychometric grounds. We show that (i) using a continuous income variable, the interaction between income, and experimental manipulation remains reliable across our experiments; (ii) our results in the cognitive control task do not appear driven by ceiling effects; and (iii) our observed post-harvest improvement is robust to the presence of learning.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84889262026

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84889262026#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1126/science.1246799

DO - 10.1126/science.1246799

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 24311666

AN - SCOPUS:84889262026

SN - 0036-8075

VL - 342

SP - 1169e

JO - Science

JF - Science

IS - 6163

ER -

Response to comment on "poverty impedes cognitive function"

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this