Abstract
Thomas Long has argued that there is an irreconcilable metaphysical difference between the views of those who, like ourselves, believe that on quality-of-life grounds it is sometimes justifiable to end the life of a severely handicapped infant, and those who, like Paul Ramsey, reject this view. Because of this metaphysical difference, Long considers it impossible for our arguments to refute Ramsey's position. We disagree.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 198-199 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1988 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health(social science)
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Resolving arguments about the sanctity of life: a response to Long.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver