Reply to king

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

In "Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise" (2007), I offer an argument for the conclusion that our controversial moral beliefs do not amount to knowledge. In this paper, I defend that argument against the criticisms put forth by Nathan King in his "McGrath on Moral Knowledge.".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-241
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Philosophical Research
Volume36
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to king'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this