TY - JOUR
T1 - Reply to commentary on the special issue Scaling up biofuels? A critical look at expectations, performance and governance
AU - Goetz, Ariane
AU - Searchinger, Tim
AU - Beringer, Tim
AU - German, Laura
AU - McKay, Ben
AU - Oliveira, Gustavo de L.T.
AU - Hunsberger, Carol
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - The special issue Scaling up bioenergy? identifies major policy expectations attached to biofuels production worldwide, and it provides systematic reviews of actual biofuel performance and governance in these areas. Papers address the extent to which policy expectations related to climate change mitigation, energy security, rural livelihoods and risk mitigation have been achieved, and the effectiveness of public and private governance in advancing sector sustainability. Building on these findings, the synthesis paper asks, “What next?” for countries wishing to advance national biofuel programmes as one option for the necessary divestment from fossil fuels. Among other sine qua nons, the special issue highlights the urgent need to downscale global energy demand, and to stop treating biofuels as an isolated sector. Goldemberg et al. (2018) query several aspects of our approach, from research design, data collection, to our recommendation to apply the “precautionary principle” in research as well as policy making. Unfortunately, Goldemberg et al. (2018) incorrectly portray our main argument. Moreover, they claim bias in our approach and mistakes in our empirical evidence, however, without bringing forward an evenhanded critique of research philosophy, methodology or referencing different empirical literature. We fully stand behind our research philosophy and findings presented.
AB - The special issue Scaling up bioenergy? identifies major policy expectations attached to biofuels production worldwide, and it provides systematic reviews of actual biofuel performance and governance in these areas. Papers address the extent to which policy expectations related to climate change mitigation, energy security, rural livelihoods and risk mitigation have been achieved, and the effectiveness of public and private governance in advancing sector sustainability. Building on these findings, the synthesis paper asks, “What next?” for countries wishing to advance national biofuel programmes as one option for the necessary divestment from fossil fuels. Among other sine qua nons, the special issue highlights the urgent need to downscale global energy demand, and to stop treating biofuels as an isolated sector. Goldemberg et al. (2018) query several aspects of our approach, from research design, data collection, to our recommendation to apply the “precautionary principle” in research as well as policy making. Unfortunately, Goldemberg et al. (2018) incorrectly portray our main argument. Moreover, they claim bias in our approach and mistakes in our empirical evidence, however, without bringing forward an evenhanded critique of research philosophy, methodology or referencing different empirical literature. We fully stand behind our research philosophy and findings presented.
KW - Biofuels
KW - Sustainability
KW - Upscaling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047107190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047107190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.046
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.046
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047107190
SN - 0301-4215
VL - 118
SP - 658
EP - 665
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
ER -