Abstract
Scientific reasoning is characterized by commitments to evidence and objectivity. New research suggests that under some conditions, people are prone to reject these commitments, and instead sanction motivated reasoning and bias. Moreover, people's tendency to devalue scientific reasoning likely explains the emergence and persistence of many biased beliefs. However, recent work in epistemology has identified ways in which bias might be legitimately incorporated into belief formation. Researchers can leverage these insights to evaluate when commonsense affirmation of bias is justified and when it is unjustified and therefore a good target for intervention. Making reasoning more scientific may require more than merely teaching people what constitutes scientific reasoning; it may require affirming the value of such reasoning in the first place.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 937-949 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Keywords
- belief
- lay epistemics
- motivated reasoning
- rationality
- scientific reasoning