Reconciling scientific and commonsense values to improve reasoning

Corey Cusimano, Tania Lombrozo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Scientific reasoning is characterized by commitments to evidence and objectivity. New research suggests that under some conditions, people are prone to reject these commitments, and instead sanction motivated reasoning and bias. Moreover, people's tendency to devalue scientific reasoning likely explains the emergence and persistence of many biased beliefs. However, recent work in epistemology has identified ways in which bias might be legitimately incorporated into belief formation. Researchers can leverage these insights to evaluate when commonsense affirmation of bias is justified and when it is unjustified and therefore a good target for intervention. Making reasoning more scientific may require more than merely teaching people what constitutes scientific reasoning; it may require affirming the value of such reasoning in the first place.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)937-949
Number of pages13
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience


  • belief
  • lay epistemics
  • motivated reasoning
  • rationality
  • scientific reasoning


Dive into the research topics of 'Reconciling scientific and commonsense values to improve reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this