Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions

Daniel Zavala-Araiza, David R. Lyon, Ramón A. Alvarez, Kenneth J. Davis, Robert Harriss, Scott C. Herndon, Anna Karion, Eric Adam Kort, Brian K. Lamb, Xin Lan, Anthony J. Marchese, Stephen W. Pacala, Allen L. Robinson, Paul B. Shepson, Colm Sweeney, Robert Talbot, Amy Townsend-Small, Tara I. Yacovitc, Daniel J. Zimmerle, Steven P. Hamburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Published estimates of methane emissions from atmospheric data (top-down approaches) exceed those from source-based inventories (bottom-up approaches), leading to conflicting claims about the climate implications of fuel switching from coal or petroleum to natural gas. Based on data from a coordinated campaign in the Barnett Shale oil and gas-producing region of Texas, we find that top-down and bottom-up estimates of both total and fossil methane emissions agree within statistical confidence intervals (relative differences are 10% for fossil methane and 0.1% for total methane). We reduced uncertainty in top-down estimates by using repeated mass balance measurements, as well as ethane as a fingerprint for source attribution. Similarly, our bottom-up estimate incorporates a more complete count of facilities than past inventories, which omitted a significant number of major sources, and more effectively accounts for the influence of large emission sources using a statistical estimator that integrates observations from multiple ground-based measurement datasets. Two percent of oil and gas facilities in the Barnett accounts for half of methane emissions at any given time, and high-emitting facilities appear to be spatiotemporally variable. Measured oil and gas methane emissions are 90% larger than estimates based on the US Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Inventory and correspond to 1.5% of natural gas production. This rate of methane loss increases the 20-y climate impacts of natural gas consumed in the region by roughly 50%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15597-15602
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume112
Issue number51
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 22 2015

Fingerprint

Methane
Oils
Natural Gas
Gases
Climate
Equipment and Supplies
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Ethane
Coal
Petroleum
Dermatoglyphics
Uncertainty
Confidence Intervals

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Keywords

  • Barnett Shale
  • Greenhouse gas footprint
  • Methane emissions
  • Natural gas supply chain
  • Oil and gas emissions

Cite this

Zavala-Araiza, D., Lyon, D. R., Alvarez, R. A., Davis, K. J., Harriss, R., Herndon, S. C., ... Hamburg, S. P. (2015). Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(51), 15597-15602. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522126112
Zavala-Araiza, Daniel ; Lyon, David R. ; Alvarez, Ramón A. ; Davis, Kenneth J. ; Harriss, Robert ; Herndon, Scott C. ; Karion, Anna ; Kort, Eric Adam ; Lamb, Brian K. ; Lan, Xin ; Marchese, Anthony J. ; Pacala, Stephen W. ; Robinson, Allen L. ; Shepson, Paul B. ; Sweeney, Colm ; Talbot, Robert ; Townsend-Small, Amy ; Yacovitc, Tara I. ; Zimmerle, Daniel J. ; Hamburg, Steven P. / Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015 ; Vol. 112, No. 51. pp. 15597-15602.
@article{62d082ba292c4881947c900578d0572e,
title = "Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions",
abstract = "Published estimates of methane emissions from atmospheric data (top-down approaches) exceed those from source-based inventories (bottom-up approaches), leading to conflicting claims about the climate implications of fuel switching from coal or petroleum to natural gas. Based on data from a coordinated campaign in the Barnett Shale oil and gas-producing region of Texas, we find that top-down and bottom-up estimates of both total and fossil methane emissions agree within statistical confidence intervals (relative differences are 10{\%} for fossil methane and 0.1{\%} for total methane). We reduced uncertainty in top-down estimates by using repeated mass balance measurements, as well as ethane as a fingerprint for source attribution. Similarly, our bottom-up estimate incorporates a more complete count of facilities than past inventories, which omitted a significant number of major sources, and more effectively accounts for the influence of large emission sources using a statistical estimator that integrates observations from multiple ground-based measurement datasets. Two percent of oil and gas facilities in the Barnett accounts for half of methane emissions at any given time, and high-emitting facilities appear to be spatiotemporally variable. Measured oil and gas methane emissions are 90{\%} larger than estimates based on the US Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Inventory and correspond to 1.5{\%} of natural gas production. This rate of methane loss increases the 20-y climate impacts of natural gas consumed in the region by roughly 50{\%}.",
keywords = "Barnett Shale, Greenhouse gas footprint, Methane emissions, Natural gas supply chain, Oil and gas emissions",
author = "Daniel Zavala-Araiza and Lyon, {David R.} and Alvarez, {Ram{\'o}n A.} and Davis, {Kenneth J.} and Robert Harriss and Herndon, {Scott C.} and Anna Karion and Kort, {Eric Adam} and Lamb, {Brian K.} and Xin Lan and Marchese, {Anthony J.} and Pacala, {Stephen W.} and Robinson, {Allen L.} and Shepson, {Paul B.} and Colm Sweeney and Robert Talbot and Amy Townsend-Small and Yacovitc, {Tara I.} and Zimmerle, {Daniel J.} and Hamburg, {Steven P.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1522126112",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "15597--15602",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "51",

}

Zavala-Araiza, D, Lyon, DR, Alvarez, RA, Davis, KJ, Harriss, R, Herndon, SC, Karion, A, Kort, EA, Lamb, BK, Lan, X, Marchese, AJ, Pacala, SW, Robinson, AL, Shepson, PB, Sweeney, C, Talbot, R, Townsend-Small, A, Yacovitc, TI, Zimmerle, DJ & Hamburg, SP 2015, 'Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 51, pp. 15597-15602. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522126112

Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions. / Zavala-Araiza, Daniel; Lyon, David R.; Alvarez, Ramón A.; Davis, Kenneth J.; Harriss, Robert; Herndon, Scott C.; Karion, Anna; Kort, Eric Adam; Lamb, Brian K.; Lan, Xin; Marchese, Anthony J.; Pacala, Stephen W.; Robinson, Allen L.; Shepson, Paul B.; Sweeney, Colm; Talbot, Robert; Townsend-Small, Amy; Yacovitc, Tara I.; Zimmerle, Daniel J.; Hamburg, Steven P.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 112, No. 51, 22.12.2015, p. 15597-15602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions

AU - Zavala-Araiza, Daniel

AU - Lyon, David R.

AU - Alvarez, Ramón A.

AU - Davis, Kenneth J.

AU - Harriss, Robert

AU - Herndon, Scott C.

AU - Karion, Anna

AU - Kort, Eric Adam

AU - Lamb, Brian K.

AU - Lan, Xin

AU - Marchese, Anthony J.

AU - Pacala, Stephen W.

AU - Robinson, Allen L.

AU - Shepson, Paul B.

AU - Sweeney, Colm

AU - Talbot, Robert

AU - Townsend-Small, Amy

AU - Yacovitc, Tara I.

AU - Zimmerle, Daniel J.

AU - Hamburg, Steven P.

PY - 2015/12/22

Y1 - 2015/12/22

N2 - Published estimates of methane emissions from atmospheric data (top-down approaches) exceed those from source-based inventories (bottom-up approaches), leading to conflicting claims about the climate implications of fuel switching from coal or petroleum to natural gas. Based on data from a coordinated campaign in the Barnett Shale oil and gas-producing region of Texas, we find that top-down and bottom-up estimates of both total and fossil methane emissions agree within statistical confidence intervals (relative differences are 10% for fossil methane and 0.1% for total methane). We reduced uncertainty in top-down estimates by using repeated mass balance measurements, as well as ethane as a fingerprint for source attribution. Similarly, our bottom-up estimate incorporates a more complete count of facilities than past inventories, which omitted a significant number of major sources, and more effectively accounts for the influence of large emission sources using a statistical estimator that integrates observations from multiple ground-based measurement datasets. Two percent of oil and gas facilities in the Barnett accounts for half of methane emissions at any given time, and high-emitting facilities appear to be spatiotemporally variable. Measured oil and gas methane emissions are 90% larger than estimates based on the US Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Inventory and correspond to 1.5% of natural gas production. This rate of methane loss increases the 20-y climate impacts of natural gas consumed in the region by roughly 50%.

AB - Published estimates of methane emissions from atmospheric data (top-down approaches) exceed those from source-based inventories (bottom-up approaches), leading to conflicting claims about the climate implications of fuel switching from coal or petroleum to natural gas. Based on data from a coordinated campaign in the Barnett Shale oil and gas-producing region of Texas, we find that top-down and bottom-up estimates of both total and fossil methane emissions agree within statistical confidence intervals (relative differences are 10% for fossil methane and 0.1% for total methane). We reduced uncertainty in top-down estimates by using repeated mass balance measurements, as well as ethane as a fingerprint for source attribution. Similarly, our bottom-up estimate incorporates a more complete count of facilities than past inventories, which omitted a significant number of major sources, and more effectively accounts for the influence of large emission sources using a statistical estimator that integrates observations from multiple ground-based measurement datasets. Two percent of oil and gas facilities in the Barnett accounts for half of methane emissions at any given time, and high-emitting facilities appear to be spatiotemporally variable. Measured oil and gas methane emissions are 90% larger than estimates based on the US Environmental Protection Agency's Greenhouse Gas Inventory and correspond to 1.5% of natural gas production. This rate of methane loss increases the 20-y climate impacts of natural gas consumed in the region by roughly 50%.

KW - Barnett Shale

KW - Greenhouse gas footprint

KW - Methane emissions

KW - Natural gas supply chain

KW - Oil and gas emissions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952684071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952684071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1522126112

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1522126112

M3 - Article

C2 - 26644584

AN - SCOPUS:84952684071

VL - 112

SP - 15597

EP - 15602

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 51

ER -