Recent issues in high-level perception

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recently, several theorists have proposed that we can perceive a range of high-level features, including natural kind features (e.g., being a lemur), artifactual features (e.g., being a mandolin), and the emotional features of others (e.g., being surprised). I clarify the claim that we perceive high-level features and suggest one overlooked reason this claim matters: it would dramatically expand the range of actions perception-based theories of action might explain. I then describe the influential phenomenal contrast method of arguing for high-level perception and discuss some of the objections that have been raised against this strategy. Finally, I describe two emerging defenses of high-level perception, one of which appeals to a certain class of perceptual deficits and one of which appeals to adaptation effects. I sketch a challenge for the latter approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)851-862
Number of pages12
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Adaptation effects
  • High-level perception
  • Perception-cognition divide
  • Phenomenal contrast method
  • Unilateral neglect
  • Visual experience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recent issues in high-level perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this