Abstract
In a number of widely studied materials, such as Si, AlAs, Bi, graphene, MoS2, and many transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, electrons acquire an additional, spinlike degree of freedom at the degenerate conduction band minima, also known as "valleys." External symmetry-breaking fields such as mechanical strain, or electric or magnetic fields, can tune the valley polarization of these materials, making them suitable candidates for "valleytronics." Here we study a quantum well of AlAs, where the two-dimensional electrons reside in two energetically degenerate valleys. By fabricating a strain-inducing grating on the sample surface, we engineer a spatial modulation of the electron population in different valleys, i.e., a "valley superlattice" in the quantum well plane. Our results establish a novel manipulation technique of the valley degree of freedom, paving the way to realizing a valley-selective layered structure in multivalley materials, with potential application in valleytronics.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 036802 |
| Journal | Physical review letters |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 16 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Realization of a Valley Superlattice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Physical review letters, Vol. 121, No. 3, 036802, 16.07.2018.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Realization of a Valley Superlattice
AU - Mueed, M. A.
AU - Hossain, Md Shafayat
AU - Jo, I.
AU - Pfeiffer, L. N.
AU - West, K. W.
AU - Baldwin, K. W.
AU - Shayegan, M.
N1 - Funding Information: Mueed M. A. Hossain Md. Shafayat Jo I. Pfeiffer L. N. West K. W. Baldwin K. W. Shayegan M. Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University , Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA 16 July 2018 20 July 2018 121 3 036802 30 December 2017 © 2018 American Physical Society 2018 American Physical Society In a number of widely studied materials, such as Si, AlAs, Bi, graphene, MoS 2 , and many transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, electrons acquire an additional, spinlike degree of freedom at the degenerate conduction band minima, also known as “valleys.” External symmetry-breaking fields such as mechanical strain, or electric or magnetic fields, can tune the valley polarization of these materials, making them suitable candidates for “valleytronics.” Here we study a quantum well of AlAs, where the two-dimensional electrons reside in two energetically degenerate valleys. By fabricating a strain-inducing grating on the sample surface, we engineer a spatial modulation of the electron population in different valleys, i.e., a “valley superlattice” in the quantum well plane. Our results establish a novel manipulation technique of the valley degree of freedom, paving the way to realizing a valley-selective layered structure in multivalley materials, with potential application in valleytronics. National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001 ECCS 1508925 DMR 1709076 MRSEC DMR 1420541 Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation 10.13039/100000936 GBMF4420 U.S. Department of Energy 10.13039/100000015 DEFG02-00-ER45841 marker L_SUGG With the ubiquitous, Si-based electronics approaching their fundamental physical limitations, there is an active push to explore novel device concepts. An emergent field is “valleytronics” which harnesses electrons’ valley degree of freedom instead of the conventional charge-based operations [1–5] . Valleys are energetically degenerate pockets in the momentum space of crystals that possess multiple conduction band minima at equal energies [1–16] . It is possible to lift the valley degeneracy by straining or placing the materials under electric or magnetic fields [1–16] . The resulting polarizability makes valleys analogous to the electron’s spin degree of freedom [1–10,12,13] , which is at the heart of “spintronics,” another branch of unconventional, next-generation electronics [17,18] . Considering the similarities, valleytronics also offers an intriguing parallel route for novelty. For example, digital information may be stored and processed by compelling electrons to selectively occupy one valley or another. Moreover, coupling the valley degree of freedom with polarized light can result in exotic optoelectronic properties [5–7] . In this study, we investigate a two-dimensional electron system (2DES) contained in a 12-nm-wide AlAs quantum well (QW) structure. The QW, located 143 nm below the surface, is sandwiched between two AlGaAs spacer layers, all grown via molecular beam epitaxy on a (001) GaAs substrate (see Supplemental Material [19] for details). The high transport mobility ( ∼ 3 × 10 5 cm 2 / V s for our samples) makes the AlAs 2DES well suited for potential valleytronics applications. Its valley degree of freedom arises from a twofold valley degeneracy [3] . We denote these valleys as X and Y with the major axes lying along [100] and [010], respectively [see Fig. 1(a) ]. Without any symmetry-breaking, uniaxial strain ( ϵ ) applied to the QW plane, electrons are equally distributed between the two valleys, where they possess an anisotropic Fermi surface with longitudinal and transverse effective masses of m l = 1.05 and m t = 0.205 , respectively, in units of the free electron mass. Under finite ϵ , however, electrons move from one valley to the other, as described in Fig. 1(b) . Here ϵ = ϵ [ 100 ] - ϵ [ 010 ] , where ϵ [ 100 ] and ϵ [ 010 ] are the strain values along [100] and [010], respectively. (The single-particle valley splitting is given by ϵ E 2 , where E 2 is the deformation potential, ≃ 5.8 eV for AlAs [3] .) Taking advantage of this intervalley transfer of electrons, we report here how to engineer a 2D valley superlattice, namely, to reconstruct a valley-degenerate 2DES plane into multiple strips where the X and Y valleys alternate as the majority-valley species. We demonstrate such a lateral modulation of the X - and Y -valley occupation through measurements of commensurability oscillations. It is worth emphasizing at the outset that, unlike the typical commensurability phenomena [20–23] , the total charge density in our system stays uniform, and it is the modulation of individual valley densities that leads to the commensurability oscillations. 1 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036802.f1 FIG. 1. (a) For 2D electrons confined to a wide AlAs QW, the degenerate X and Y valleys are equally occupied. (b) Positive symmetry-breaking, uniaxial strain ( ϵ = ϵ [ 100 ] - ϵ [ 010 ] ) in the QW plane transfers 2D electrons from the X valley to the Y valley, and vice versa for negative ϵ . (c) Sample schematic. The surface is partially covered by a grating made of strips of electron-beam resist (blue strips). Each box in (d) represents the valley occupation of the 2DES directly above it, as also indicated by the density plots at the bottom of the panel. Here we portray n X and n Y plots as step functions for simplicity; however, a sinusoidal variation may be more realistic. Note that the total density n is constant in all boxes. (e) Magnetoresistance traces for the patterned region (blue) and reference region (black) for n ≃ 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 . The inset shows the Fourier transform (FT) spectrum of the oscillations (marked by vertical arrows) in the blue trace; the green and red circles mark the expected positions of the maxima in the FT spectrum. Figure 1(c) illustrates our approach to realizing a valley superlattice. We partially pattern the surface of a standard Hall bar sample along [100] with a grating (shown as blue strips) of 200-nm periodicity, made of negative electron-beam resist. When cooled to low temperatures, strain develops at the interface of each resist strip and the sample surface, thanks to their different thermal contraction coefficients [24–26] . The strain field can then couple to the AlAs QW through the deformation potential. Now, assuming the 2DES below each resist strip is under negative ϵ , it must be under positive ϵ between two strips. The periodic grating thus should subject the 2DES to varying ϵ of the same periodicity, locally breaking the valley degeneracy. As a result, the 2DES (with total density n ) should separate into multiple 200-nm-wide regions, each of which is partially valley polarized with the majority electron population periodically alternating between the X and Y valleys (of density n X and n Y ). Such a density profile is depicted in the blue boxes in Fig. 1(d) , each corresponding to the 2DES section directly above it, as well as the n X and n Y plots. While we expect n X > n Y below each resist strip and n Y > n X in between, the total density n = n X + n Y is independent of strain [3] and should stay uniform for the entire patterned region. Note that AlAs and GaAs are generally piezoelectric. However, they belong to the symmetry group 43m and are not piezoelectric along [100] [25,27] , the direction of the surface grating in our sample. This rules out any electric field modulation due to the periodic surface strain along [100], implying a uniform total 2DES density in that direction [25,27] , which is in agreement with the constant total density profile depicted in Fig. 1(d) . For the unpatterned (reference) region, the 2DES remains valley degenerate ( n X = n Y = n / 2 ). To establish the existence of a valley superlattice in the patterned region, one needs to probe the spatial valley densities, for which we employ the commensurability (also known as Weiss) oscillations (COs) technique [20–23] . By passing current along the grating direction ([100]) under a perpendicular magnetic field ( B ⊥ ), we look for low-field magnetoresistance minima, expected whenever the cyclotron orbit diameter ( 2 R C ) of electrons becomes commensurate with the period ( a ) of the 2DES density modulation. The exact condition for commensurability is 2 R C / a = i - 1 / 4 , where i is an integer [20–23] . The B ⊥ positions of the CO minima depend on the 2DES density according to 2 R C = 2 k F / e B ⊥ , where k F = 2 π n for a single-valley, isotropic 2DES. Before discussing the COs for the bivalley, anisotropic AlAs 2DES, we emphasize an important point. The prerequisite for COs is a periodic density modulation, usually rendered in the total density by various means such as an optical interference pattern [20] , electrostatic gating [22] , or strain-inducing surface superlattice in piezoelectric materials (along the appropriate crystal direction) [25] . In stark contrast to the typical CO scenario, the total density in our samples should be uniform for strain modulation along [100], thanks to the underlying crystal symmetry mentioned previously. This compelling difference guarantees that COs we report here, as discussed below, must originate from the modulation in the individual valley densities [see Fig. 1(d) ], i.e., a valley superlattice . Our transport measurements are carried out in a He 3 cryostat at a temperature of 0.3 K. By varying the illumination time at low temperatures, we tuned n between 2.0 and 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 . Figure 1(e) shows the magnetoresistance from the patterned (blue trace, R pat ) and reference (black trace, R ref ) regions for n ≃ 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 , as current is passed along [100]. Near B ⊥ = 0 , R pat exhibits a pronounced V -shaped resistance minimum followed by multiple minima (vertical arrows) at slightly higher B ⊥ . The absence of such minima in R ref points to their COs’ origin. To further corroborate, we also present in the Fig. 1(e) inset the Fourier transform (FT) spectrum of the oscillations observed in R pat . Note that, for an AlAs 2DES, there are two relevant k F for COs along the modulation direction of [100], each for the elliptical Fermi surfaces of the X and Y valley, k F , X and k F , Y , respectively; here k F , X 2 = 2 π n X ( m t / m l ) and k F , Y 2 = 2 π n Y ( m l / m t ) [28] . Based on the expression f CO = 2 ℏ k F / e a , and assuming the average densities of n X = n Y = n / 2 , we mark with green and red circles the expected CO frequencies for the X and Y valleys, respectively. The peaks in the FT spectrum closely agree with the expected COs’ frequencies, justifying our n X = n Y = n / 2 assumption. This establishes that the oscillations in R pat are indeed COs, providing strong evidence for the periodic modulation in both the X - and Y -valley density in the patterned region. Next we present data in Fig. 2 to further consolidate the existence of the valley superlattice as we manipulate the individual valley densities by applying global, uniaxial strain. For this purpose, we glue the back side of our sample, with its length along [100], to one side of a stacked piezoelectric actuator and a strain gauge to the opposite side [see Fig. 2(a) ]. Via applying a voltage ( V P ) to the actuator’s leads, a global, in-plane ϵ ( = ϵ [ 100 ] - ϵ [ 010 ] ) is added to the 2DES. First we address the strain-induced piezoresistance behavior of the patterned region for n ≃ 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 , taken at B ⊥ = 0 . The resistance profile, shown in Fig. 2(b) , is typical of the bivalley AlAs 2DES [3] and reflects the intervalley transfer of electrons and their anisotropic mobility in the X and Y valleys. At large negative ϵ , the resistance saturates when only the X valley, which has a large effective mass ( m l ) and therefore high resistance along [100], is occupied (point E ). For increasing ϵ , however, the resistance starts to drop as electrons begin the intervalley transfer (points D − B ) and eventually saturates at large positive ϵ . Now all electrons reside in the Y valley, which has low resistance along [100] (point A ). The reduction in resistance stems from the Y -valley electrons’ smaller effective mass ( m t ) and higher mobility along the current direction ([100]). We remark that the saturating behavior of resistance at large | ϵ | is consistent with the green and red shaded regions, expected for the only- X - or only- Y -valley occupation in the 2DES, according to previous measurements [11,29] . 2 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036802.f2 FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup for the application of global, uniaxial strain ( ϵ ) with the sample and a strain gauge glued to the opposite faces of a piezoactuator. (b) Piezoresistance of the patterned region as a function of ϵ for n ≃ 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 . We mark points A – E on the trace. (c) Magnetoresistance traces corresponding to points A – E in (b). The traces are vertically offset for clarity. Arrows mark the prominent CO minima observed in the black traces. At higher fields, Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations, originating from the formation of well-defined Landau levels, are observed. (d) Schematic of the spatial density profile of the X and Y valleys for points A – E . Note that the density distributions shown are only qualitative. (e) Examples of FT spectra for different strain values. (f) Plot of the observed FT frequencies squared versus ϵ . The dashed green and red lines represent the expected ϵ -induced evolution of the CO frequencies from the X and Y valleys, respectively, for n ≃ 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 . In Fig. 2(c) , we show a series of low- B ⊥ magnetoresistance traces corresponding to points A − E in Fig. 2(b) . At ϵ = 0 (point C ), R pat manifests pronounced CO minima, as previously addressed in Fig. 1(e) . For moderate negative ϵ (point D ), the minima (marked by vertical arrows) move out to higher B ⊥ , expected for the growing X -valley population which increases k F , X . However, for point E , when the 2DES is completely valley polarized (only X ) at large ϵ < 0 , the COs disappear and instead strong Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations are seen. Much like the ϵ < 0 case, the COs are present (vertical arrows) only at moderate positive ϵ but not at large ϵ > 0 (point A ) when the 2DES is once again fully valley polarized (only Y ) [see the top trace in Fig. 2(c) ]. Note that if any residual piezoelectric effect were present along [100], it should modulate the total density even in the fully valley-polarized 2DES and give rise to COs. The absence of COs for the only- X or - Y cases therefore unambiguously rules out the existence of a piezoelectric effect along [100], as expected [25,27] . This also reaffirms that the observed COs are indeed made possible by the valley superlattice, which exists only in the bivalley cases, i.e., when both the X and Y valleys are occupied (points B − D ). Figure 2(d) further elucidates how the valley modulation (present in the bivalley cases) from the local strain field evolves under increasing global ϵ from the piezoactuator and is eventually nullified when large | ϵ | fully valley polarizes the entire 2DES. Figures 2(e) and 2(f) present a more quantitative picture of how each valley contributes to the COs as a function of ϵ . In Fig. 2(e) , we show FT spectra at a few representative strains. We plot these CO frequencies squared as a function of ϵ in Fig. 2(f) . The dashed green and red lines are based on the expressions f CO , Y 2 = h 2 m l / m t ( n + Δ n ) / π e 2 a 2 and f CO , X 2 = h 2 m t / m l ( n - Δ n ) / π e 2 a 2 , where f CO , Y and f CO , X are the expected CO frequencies for the Y and X valleys at a given Δ n ( = n Y - n X ), the density difference between the two valleys [28] . Here we convert Δ n to ϵ according to their empirical relation for n ≃ 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 , as reported in Ref. [30] , and the dashed lines are based on the relation f CO = 2 ℏ k F / e a [28] . As more electrons are transferred from the X to the Y valley with increasing ϵ [see Fig. 2(d) ], k F , X shrinks and thereby f CO , X decreases. In contrast, f CO , Y increases, since k F , Y gets enhanced. As seen in Fig. 2(f) , the COs’ frequencies nicely agree with the dashed lines, confirming that they originate from the valley modulation of the X and Y valleys. (See Supplemental Material [19] for more details). In summary, our results demonstrate a novel technique to induce a periodic valley modulation for 2D electrons in a multivalley system. We remark in closing on a possible extension of our work to realize a device which could support one-dimensional, helical edge modes (Fig. 3 ) and therefore be of potential use in exploring Majorana fermion physics. Note that our choice of a negative electron-beam resist as the surface grating yields a valley modulation of ≃ 20 % in our samples (see Supplemental Material [31] ). This modulation may be enhanced to essentially 100% by using a grating material, e.g., Ti, whose thermal contraction coefficient is significantly different from that of GaAs/AlAs [34] , meaning that the 2D electrons in alternating strips would occupy either X or Y valleys. As illustrated in Fig. 3 , when current is passed parallel to the valley-polarized strips at the ν = 1 integer quantum Hall state [35] , the large B ⊥ -induced one-dimensional edge states should be confined within each strip. This paves the way to realizing counterpropagating, edge channels of different valleys ( X and Y ) at the boundary between two strips. 3 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036802.f3 FIG. 3. Schematic of realizing valley helical edge states from a valley superlattice subjected to large perpendicular magnetic fields. The valley-polarized edge modes depicted in Fig. 3 mimic the spin-polarized one-dimensional helical channels where an electron’s spin is locked to its momentum. Recent years have seen a dramatic surge in the studies of spin helical edge modes, with a particular emphasis on coupling with s -wave superconductors to engineer Majorana fermions [36,37] . The accessibility to Majorana modes, combined with their potential as the building blocks for fault-tolerant quantum computation [38,39] , has made the host materials of helical conductors desired systems for future quantum devices. Of particular interest are quantum Hall based systems that provide a robust platform for spin helical edge conduction [40–42] . Our proposed valley helical edge modes in the quantum Hall regime (Fig. 3 ) extend beyond such helical channels of the spin variety. Although it remains to be seen whether the valley, often considered as a pseudospin [1–3,8–10] , can lead to similar Majorana physics as the spin degree of freedom, our results certainly enrich the potential of multivalley systems for device application. We acknowledge support through the National Science Foundation (Grants No. ECCS 1508925 and No. DMR 1709076) for measurements. For sample fabrication and characterization, we also acknowledge the National Science Foundation (Grant No. MRSEC DMR 1420541), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Grant No. GBMF4420), and the Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences (DEFG02-00-ER45841). [1] 1 O. Gunawan , Y. P. Shkolnikov , K. Vakili , T. Gokmen , E. P. De Poortere , and M. Shayegan , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 , 186404 ( 2006 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.186404 [2] 2 O. Gunawan , B. Habib , E. P. De Poortere , and M. Shayegan , Phys. Rev. B 74 , 155436 ( 2006 ). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.155436 [3] 3 M. Shayegan , E. P. De Poortere , O. Gunawan , Y. P. Shkolnikov , E. Tutuc , and K. Vakili , Phys. Status Solidi (b) 243 , 3629 ( 2006 ). PSSBBD 0370-1972 10.1002/pssb.200642212 [4] 4 A. Rycerz , I. Tworzydlo , and C. W. Beenakker , Nat. Phys. 3 , 172 ( 2007 ). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys547 [5] 5 J. R. Schaibley , H. Yu , G. Clark , P. Rivera , J. S. Ross , K. L. Seyler , W. Yao , and X. Xu , Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 , 16055 ( 2016 ). NRMADL 2058-8437 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.55 [6] 6 H. Zeng , J. Dai , W. Yao , D. Xiao , and X. Cui , Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 , 490 ( 2012 ). NNAABX 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2012.95 [7] 7 A. M. Jones , H. Yu , N. J. Ghimire , S. Wu , G. Aivazian , J. S. Ross , B. Zhao , J. Yan , D. G. Mandrus , D. Xiao , W. Yao , and X. Xu , Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 , 634 ( 2013 ). NNAABX 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2013.151 [8] 8 Y. P. Shkolnikov , K. Vakili , E. P. De Poortere , and M. Shayegan , Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 246804 ( 2004 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246804 [9] 9 Y. P. Shkolnikov , S. Misra , N. C. Bishop , E. P. De Poortere , and M. Shayegan , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 066809 ( 2005 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.066809 [10] 10 O. Gunawan , T. Gokmen , K. Vakili , M. Padmanabhan , E. P. De Poortere , and M. Shayegan , Nat. Phys. 3 , 388 ( 2007 ). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys596 [11] 11 T. Gokmen , M. Padmanabhan , O. Gunawan , Y. P. Shkolnikov , K. Vakili , E. P. DePoortere , and M. Shayegan , Phys. Rev. B 78 , 233306 ( 2008 ). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.233306 [12] 12 M. Rasolt , in Solids State Physics , edited by H. Ehrenreich and D. Turnbull ( Academic , San Diego, 1990 ), Vol. 43 , p. 93 . [13] 13 M. Rasolt , B. I. Halperin , and D. Vanderbilt , Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 , 126 ( 1986 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.126 [14] 14 A. F. Young , C. R. Dean , L. Wang , H. Ren , P. Cadden-Zimansky , K. Watanabe , T. Taniguchi , J. Hone , K. L. Shepard , and P. Kim , Nat. Phys. 8 , 550 ( 2012 ). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys2307 [15] 15 B. E. Feldman , M. T. Randeria1 , A. Gyenis , F. Wu , H. Ji , R. J. Cava , A. H. MacDonald , and A. Yazdani , Science 354 , 316 ( 2016 ). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.aag1715 [16] 16 Z. Zhu , J. Wang , H. Zuo , B. Fauqué , R. D. McDonald , Y. Fuseya , and K. Behnia , Nat. Commun. 8 , 15297 ( 2017 ). NCAOBW 2041-1723 10.1038/ncomms15297 [17] 17 I. Zutić , J. Fabian , and S. Das Sarma , Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 , 323 ( 2004 ). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 [18] 18 R. Jansen , Nat. Mater. 11 , 400 ( 2012 ). NMAACR 1476-1122 10.1038/nmat3293 [19] 19 See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036802 for details on sample growth, experimental techniques, additional data and analysis. [20] 20 D. Weiss , K. von Klitzing , K. Ploog , and G. Weimann , Europhys. Lett. 8 , 179 ( 1989 ). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/8/2/012 [21] 21 R. R. Gerhardts , D. Weiss , and K. von Klitzing , Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 , 1173 ( 1989 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1173 [22] 22 R. W. Winkler , J. P. Kotthaus , and K. Ploog , Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 , 1177 ( 1989 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1177 [23] 23 C. W. J. Beenakker , Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 , 2020 ( 1989 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2020 [24] 24 J. H. Davies and I. A. Larkin , Phys. Rev. B 49 , 4800 ( 1994 ). PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.4800 [25] 25 E. Skuras , A. R. Long , I. A. Larkin , J. H. Davies , and M. C. Holland , Appl. Phys. Lett. 70 , 871 ( 1997 ). APPLAB 0003-6951 10.1063/1.118301 [26] 26 A. R. Long , E. Skuras , S. Vallis , R. Cusco , I. A. Larkin , J. H. Davies , and M. C. Holland , Phys. Rev. B 60 , 1964 ( 1999 ). PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1964 [27] 27 J. F. Nye , The Physical Properties of Crystals ( Oxford University Press , New York, 1957 ). [28] 28 O. Gunawan , Y. P. Shkolnikov , E. P. De Poortere , E. Tutuc , and M. Shayegan , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 246603 ( 2004 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.246603 [29] 29 T. Gokmen , M. Padmanabhan , and M. Shayegan , Nat. Phys. 6 , 621 ( 2010 ). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys1684 [30] 30 T. Gokmen , M. Padmanabhan , O. Gunawan , Y. P. Shkolnikov , K. Vakili , E. P. De Poortere , and M. Shayegan , Phys. Rev. B 78 , 233306 ( 2008 ). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.233306 [31] 31 See Sec. IV in Supplemental Material at for http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036802 , the method used to estimate the valley modulation amplitude. This section includes Refs. [32,33]. [32] 32 P. H. Beton , E. S. Alves , P. C. Main , L. Eaves , M. W. Dellow , M. Henini , O. H. Hughes , S. P. Beaumont , and C. D. W. Wilkinson , Phys. Rev. B 42 , 9229 ( 1990 ). PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.9229 [33] 33 A. Endo and Y. Iye , Phys. Rev. B 72 , 235303 ( 2005 ). PRBMDO 1098-0121 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.235303 [34] Our estimate is based on the following considerations. As seen in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c) , a strain of | ϵ | ≃ 2.6 × 10 - 4 can completely valley polarize the 2DES, i.e., to transfer 100% density to one valley for n ≃ 3.7 × 10 11 cm - 2 . (Even less strain would be needed for smaller 2DES densities.) It then follows from a valley modulation of ≃ 20 % that the modulated local strain responsible for the COs is ≃ 0.26 × 10 - 4 . Now, a strip of Ti on a GaAs substrate is expected to produce 10 - 3 of local surface strain [24,25] which, in principle, should completely valley polarize each AlAs 2DES strip illustrated in Figs. 1(c) and 1(d) . [35] 35 K. von Klitzing , Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 , 519 ( 1986 ). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.58.519 [36] 36 R. M. Lutchyn , J. D. Sau , and S. Das Sarma , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 , 077001 ( 2010 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.077001 [37] 37 Y. Oreg , G. Refael , and F. von Oppen , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 , 177002 ( 2010 ). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.177002 [38] 38 S. Das Sarma , M. Freedman , and C. Nayak , npj Quantum Inf. 1 , 15001 ( 2015 ). 2056-6387 10.1038/npjqi.2015.1 [39] 39 T. Karzig , C. Knapp , R. M. Lutchyn , P. Bonderson , M. B. Hastings , C. Nayak , J. Alicea , K. Flensberg , S. Plugge , Y. Oreg , C. M. Marcus , and M. H. Freedman , Phys. Rev. B 95 , 235305 ( 2017 ). PRBMDO 2469-9950 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.235305 [40] 40 A. F. Young , J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi , B. M. Hunt , S. H. Choi , K. Watanabe , T. Taniguchi , R. C. Ashoori , and P. Jarillo-Herrero , Nature (London) 505 , 528 ( 2014 ). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature12800 [41] 41 J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi , J. Y. Luo , A. F. Young , B. M. Hunt , K. Watanabe , T. Taniguchi , R. C. Ashoori , and P. Jarillo-Herrero , Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 , 118 ( 2017 ). NNAABX 1748-3387 10.1038/nnano.2016.214 [42] 42 Y. Ronen , Y. Cohen , D. Banitt , M. Heiblum , and V. Umansky , Nat. Phys. 14 , 411 ( 2018 ). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/s41567-017-0035-2 Funding Information: We acknowledge support through the National Science Foundation (Grants No.ECCS 1508925 and No.DMR 1709076) for measurements. For sample fabrication and characterization, we alsoacknowledge the National Science Foundation (Grant No.MRSEC DMR 1420541), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (Grant No.GBMF4420), and the Department of Energy Basic Energy Sciences (DEFG02-00-ER45841). Publisher Copyright: © 2018 American Physical Society.
PY - 2018/7/16
Y1 - 2018/7/16
N2 - In a number of widely studied materials, such as Si, AlAs, Bi, graphene, MoS2, and many transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, electrons acquire an additional, spinlike degree of freedom at the degenerate conduction band minima, also known as "valleys." External symmetry-breaking fields such as mechanical strain, or electric or magnetic fields, can tune the valley polarization of these materials, making them suitable candidates for "valleytronics." Here we study a quantum well of AlAs, where the two-dimensional electrons reside in two energetically degenerate valleys. By fabricating a strain-inducing grating on the sample surface, we engineer a spatial modulation of the electron population in different valleys, i.e., a "valley superlattice" in the quantum well plane. Our results establish a novel manipulation technique of the valley degree of freedom, paving the way to realizing a valley-selective layered structure in multivalley materials, with potential application in valleytronics.
AB - In a number of widely studied materials, such as Si, AlAs, Bi, graphene, MoS2, and many transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, electrons acquire an additional, spinlike degree of freedom at the degenerate conduction band minima, also known as "valleys." External symmetry-breaking fields such as mechanical strain, or electric or magnetic fields, can tune the valley polarization of these materials, making them suitable candidates for "valleytronics." Here we study a quantum well of AlAs, where the two-dimensional electrons reside in two energetically degenerate valleys. By fabricating a strain-inducing grating on the sample surface, we engineer a spatial modulation of the electron population in different valleys, i.e., a "valley superlattice" in the quantum well plane. Our results establish a novel manipulation technique of the valley degree of freedom, paving the way to realizing a valley-selective layered structure in multivalley materials, with potential application in valleytronics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050408098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050408098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036802
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.036802
M3 - Article
C2 - 30085799
AN - SCOPUS:85050408098
SN - 0031-9007
VL - 121
JO - Physical review letters
JF - Physical review letters
IS - 3
M1 - 036802
ER -