Abstract
This reply to Gila Stopler's provocative piece on the possible complicity of political liberalism and right-wing populism welcomes Stopler's strategy of identifying structural weaknesses in liberal theory. But it also presents three specific disagreements: first, it is argued that Rawls is much less of a defender of the status quo in really existing liberal democracies than Stopler makes him out to be; second, the argument is advanced that political liberalism has significant resources to counter right-wing populism; and, third and most important, it is claimed, following the work of philosophers such as Gina Schouten, that political liberalism can (and must) incorporate feminist concerns.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 419-422 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | International Journal of Constitutional Law |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rawls and right-wing populism - A qualified defense of the former: A reply to Gila Stopler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver