Abstract
Lara Buchak argues for a version of rank-weighted utilitarianism that assigns greater weight to the interests of the worse off. She argues that our distributive principles should be derived from the preferences of rational individuals behind a veil of ignorance, who ought to be risk-averse. I argue that Buchak’s appeal to the veil of ignorance leads to a particular way of extending rank-weighted utilitarianism to the evaluation of uncertain prospects. This method recommends choices that violate the unanimous preferences of rational individuals and choices that guarantee worse distributions. These results, I suggest, undermine Buchak’s argument for rank-weighted utilitarianism.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-106 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Ethics |
Volume | 131 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy