Abstract
Patterns used for supersampling in graphics have been analyzed from statistical and signal-processing viewpoints. We present an analysis based on a type of isotropic discrepancy - how good patterns are at estimating the area above an arbitrary edge through a pixel. An algorithm is presented for computing the worst-case discrepancy. Experimental evidence shows that popular supersampling patterns have discrepancies with better asymptotic behavior than random sampling, which is not inconsistent with theoretical bounds on discrepancy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 62-69 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Proceedings - Graphics Interface |
| State | Published - 1993 |
| Event | Proceedings of the Graphics Interface - Toronto, Ont, Can Duration: May 19 1993 → May 21 1993 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Random-edge discrepancy of supersampling patterns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver