Quantifying theory in politics: Identification, interpretation, and the role of structural methods

Nathan Canen, Kristopher Ramsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The best empirical research in political science clearly defines substantive parameters of interest, presents a set of assumptions that guarantees their identification, and uses an appropriate estimator. We argue for the importance of explicitly integrating rigorous theory into this process and focus on the advantages of doing so. By integrating a theoretical structure into one’s empirical strategy, researchers can quantify the effects of competing mechanisms, consider the ex-ante effects of new policies, extrapolate findings to new environments, estimate model-specific theoretical parameters, evaluate the fit of a theoretical model, and test competing models that aim to explain the same phenomena. As a guide to such a methodology, we provide an overview of structural estimation, including formal definitions, implementation suggestions, examples, and comparisons to other methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-327
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Theoretical Politics
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Keywords

  • Counterfactuals
  • formal theory
  • identification
  • quantitative methods
  • research designs
  • structural methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying theory in politics: Identification, interpretation, and the role of structural methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this