Abstract
Both under-and over-treatment of communicable diseases are public bads. But efforts to decrease one run the risk of increasing the other. Using rich experimental data on household treatment-seeking behavior in Kenya, we study the implications of this trade-off for subsidizing life-saving antimalarials sold over-The-counter at retail drug outlets. We show that a very high subsidy (such as the one under consideration by the international community) dramatically increases access, but nearly one-half of subsidized pills go to patients without malaria. We study two ways to better target subsidized drugs: reducing the subsidy level, and introducing rapid malaria tests over-The-counter.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 609-645 |
| Number of pages | 37 |
| Journal | American Economic Review |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Price subsidies, diagnostic tests, and targeting of malaria treatment: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver