Prevention against equality?

Marc Fleurbaey, Gregory Ponthiere

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations


Common sense supports prevention policies aimed at improving survival prospects among the population. It is also widely acknowledged that an early death is a serious disadvantage, and that attention should be paid to the compensation of short-lived individuals. This paper re-examines the compatibility of those two concerns: prevention against early death and compensation for early death. We show that, under mild conditions, no social ordering on allocations can satisfy a concern for prevention and a concern for compensation. The reason is that if it is socially desirable to raise the number of survivors through prevention, it must also be, under costly prevention, desirable to deteriorate the living standards of the short-lived. We then explore two approaches to the prevention/compensation dilemma, and study the associated optimal allocation of resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-84
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Public Economics
StatePublished - Jul 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics


  • Compensation
  • Equality
  • Longevity
  • Mortality
  • Prevention


Dive into the research topics of 'Prevention against equality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this