PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: IS THE SANCTITY OF LIFE ETHIC TERMINALLY ILL?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our growing technical capacity to keep human beings alive has brought the sanctity of life ethic to the point of collapse. The shift to a concept of brain death was already an implicit abandonment of the traditional ethic, though this has only recently become apparent. The 1993 decision of the British House of Lords in the case of Anthony Bland is an even more decisive shift towards an ethic that does not ask or seek to preserve human life as such, but only a life that is worth living. Once this shift has been completed and assimilated, we will no longer need the concept of brain death. Instead we can face directly the real ethical issue: when may doctors intentionally end the life of a patient?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-343
Number of pages17
JournalBioethics
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1995
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: IS THE SANCTITY OF LIFE ETHIC TERMINALLY ILL?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this