Possible animal-body fossils in pre-Marinoan limestones from South Australia

Adam C. Maloof, Catherine V. Rose, Robert Beach, Bradley M. Samuels, Claire C. Calmet, Douglas H. Erwin, Gerald R. Poirier, Nan Yao, Frederik J. Simons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Neoproterozoic era was punctuated by the Sturtian (about 710 million years ago) and Marinoan (about 635 million years ago) intervals of glaciation. In South Australia, the rocks left behind by the glaciations are separated by a succession of limestones and shales, which were deposited at tropical latitudes. Here we describe millimetre- to centimetre-scale fossils from the Trezona Formation, which pre-dates the Marinoan glaciation. These weakly calcified fossils occur as anvil, wishbone, ring and perforated slab shapes and are contained within stromatolitic limestones. The Trezona Formation fossils pre-date the oldest known calcified fossils of this size by 90 million years, and cannot be separated from the surrounding calcite matrix or imaged by traditional X-ray-based tomographic scanning methods. Instead, we have traced cross-sections of individual fossils by serially grinding and scanning each sample at a resolution of 50.8 μm. From these images we constructed three-dimensional digital models of the fossils. Our reconstructions show a population of ellipsoidal organisms without symmetry and with a network of interior canals that lead to circular apertures on the fossil surface. We suggest that several characteristics of these reef-dwelling fossils are best explained if the fossils are identified as sponge-grade metazoans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)653-659
Number of pages7
JournalNature Geoscience
Volume3
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Possible animal-body fossils in pre-Marinoan limestones from South Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this