TY - JOUR
T1 - Population viability analyses on a cycling population
T2 - A cautionary tale
AU - Chapman, Andrew P.
AU - Brook, Barry W.
AU - Clutton-Brock, Tim H.
AU - Grenfell, Bryan T.
AU - Frankham, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank J. O'Grady and J. Pemberton for comments and suggestions on the manuscript. This work was supported by an Australian Research Council grant to R.F. and by UK NERC grants to T.H.C.-B. and B.T.G. This is publication number 279 of the Key Centre for Biodiversity and Bioresources.
Copyright:
Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Population viability analysis (PVA) packages do not always allow realistic simulation of particular life cycle features, so they may produce unrealistic predictions of extinction risk. This was suspected for a cycling Soay sheep population, Ovis aries L., that grows, overeats its habitat and then suffers high winter mortality. We compared projections of PVA models for the sheep that incorporated either an unrealistic ceiling carrying capacity using INMAT (the only choice) and VORTEX (the default), or realistic density dependence for survival (VORTEX). At year 50, the ceiling models predicted extinction probabilities of 60.4% (INMAT) and 87.4% (VORTEX), compared to only 4.6% for the density-dependent model. Small populations were equally likely to increase or decrease with the ceiling models, while they had high probabilities of increase with the density-dependent model, as found in reality. PVA cannot be relied upon to produce realistic projections if inappropriate mechanisms of population regulation are used. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
AB - Population viability analysis (PVA) packages do not always allow realistic simulation of particular life cycle features, so they may produce unrealistic predictions of extinction risk. This was suspected for a cycling Soay sheep population, Ovis aries L., that grows, overeats its habitat and then suffers high winter mortality. We compared projections of PVA models for the sheep that incorporated either an unrealistic ceiling carrying capacity using INMAT (the only choice) and VORTEX (the default), or realistic density dependence for survival (VORTEX). At year 50, the ceiling models predicted extinction probabilities of 60.4% (INMAT) and 87.4% (VORTEX), compared to only 4.6% for the density-dependent model. Small populations were equally likely to increase or decrease with the ceiling models, while they had high probabilities of increase with the density-dependent model, as found in reality. PVA cannot be relied upon to produce realistic projections if inappropriate mechanisms of population regulation are used. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
KW - Density dependence
KW - Extinction risk
KW - Ovis aries
KW - Population regulation
KW - Population viability analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035209788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035209788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00100-2
DO - 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00100-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035209788
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 97
SP - 61
EP - 69
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
IS - 1
ER -