TY - JOUR
T1 - Polygenic Scores for Plasticity
T2 - A New Tool for Studying Gene–Environment Interplay
AU - Johnson, Rebecca
AU - Sotoudeh, Ramina
AU - Conley, Dalton
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Fertility, health, education, and other outcomes of interest to demographers are the product of an individual’s genetic makeup and their social environment. Yet, gene × environment (G×E) research deploys a limited toolkit on the genetic side to study the gene–environment interplay, relying on polygenic scores (PGSs) that reflect the influence of genetics on levels of an outcome. In this article, we develop a genetic summary measure better suited for G×E research: variance polygenic scores (vPGSs), which are PGSs that reflect genetic contributions to plasticity in outcomes. First, we use the UK Biobank (N ∼408,000 in the analytic sample) and the Health and Retirement Study (N ∼ 5,700 in the analytic sample) to compare four approaches to constructing PGSs for plasticity. The results show that widely used methods for discovering which genetic variants affect outcome variability fail to serve as distinctive new tools for G×E. Second, using the PGSs that do capture distinctive genetic contributions to plasticity, we analyze heterogeneous effects of a UK education reform on health and educational attainment. The results show the properties of a useful new tool for population scientists studying the interplay of nature and nurture and for population-based studies that are releasing PGSs to applied researchers.
AB - Fertility, health, education, and other outcomes of interest to demographers are the product of an individual’s genetic makeup and their social environment. Yet, gene × environment (G×E) research deploys a limited toolkit on the genetic side to study the gene–environment interplay, relying on polygenic scores (PGSs) that reflect the influence of genetics on levels of an outcome. In this article, we develop a genetic summary measure better suited for G×E research: variance polygenic scores (vPGSs), which are PGSs that reflect genetic contributions to plasticity in outcomes. First, we use the UK Biobank (N ∼408,000 in the analytic sample) and the Health and Retirement Study (N ∼ 5,700 in the analytic sample) to compare four approaches to constructing PGSs for plasticity. The results show that widely used methods for discovering which genetic variants affect outcome variability fail to serve as distinctive new tools for G×E. Second, using the PGSs that do capture distinctive genetic contributions to plasticity, we analyze heterogeneous effects of a UK education reform on health and educational attainment. The results show the properties of a useful new tool for population scientists studying the interplay of nature and nurture and for population-based studies that are releasing PGSs to applied researchers.
KW - BMI
KW - Education
KW - Gene–environment interactions
KW - Health and Retirement Study
KW - UK Biobank
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131702659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131702659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1215/00703370-9957418
DO - 10.1215/00703370-9957418
M3 - Article
C2 - 35553650
AN - SCOPUS:85131702659
SN - 0070-3370
VL - 59
SP - 1045
EP - 1070
JO - Demography
JF - Demography
IS - 3
ER -