Abstract
This essay compares the way in which Russia and Ireland have defined themselves since the mid-nineteenth century as scientific nations (or not) by following the careers of D. I. Mendeleev (1834-1907) and Thomas Andrews (1813-85), both of whom were involved in the discovery of the "critical point" boundary between liquids and gases. Mendeleev and Andrews deployed their critical-point research in a similar fashion to integrate science into the national identity for their respective countries, a strategy that proved far more successful for Mendeleev than for Andrews.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 99-119 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Osiris |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cultural Studies
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Points critical: Russia, Ireland, and science at the boundary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver