Abstract
This article analyzes Socrates’ rejection of Euthyphro’s third definition of the pious as that which all the gods love. Socrates distinguishes between two arguments: one that refutes the claim that being loved by all the gods is the essence of piety, and an- other one that shows that the pious and being dear to the gods are not the same. Socrates introduces an explanatory hierarchy: the pious explains being loved by the gods, which in turn ex- plains being dear to the gods. This shows that the pious cannot be defined as being loved by the gods, since it lacks the requisite explanatory profile.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111-131 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Topicos (Mexico) |
| Issue number | 74 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2026 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- attribute
- dear to the gods
- essence
- Euthyphro
- explanatory hierarchy
- gods
- loved by the gods
- piety
- Plato
- Socrates
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Piety and Its Essence in Plato’s Euthyphro'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver