TY - JOUR
T1 - Person concepts
T2 - The effect of target familiarity and descriptive purpose on the process of describing others
AU - Fiske, Susan T.
AU - Cox, Martha G.
PY - 1979/3
Y1 - 1979/3
N2 - The relationship between object and person perception is explored in free‐response person descriptions. A taxonomy which applies to both person and object descriptions, that is, a theoretically extensible taxonomy, potentially provides theoretical continuities across areas of perception. Evidence for the taxonomy's validity, or psychological meaningfulness, comes from differential usage of its components in (1) describing familiar and stranger target persons, (2) for physical versus indepth descriptive purposes, and (3) over the stages of the descriptive output. Descriptions of friends focus relatively more on personality traits and personal origins, while descriptions of strangers focus on context. Physical descriptions not surprisingly emphasize appearance, while indepth descriptions include mostly personality traits, as well as observable behaviors, appearance terms, and relationship descriptors. Differential usage of the components over stages of the description reveals that descriptions usually begin with appearance and later include typical behaviors and personality terms. Relationship labels, when used, occur at the beginning. Parallels with object description are discussed, and structural implications for concept storage are explored.
AB - The relationship between object and person perception is explored in free‐response person descriptions. A taxonomy which applies to both person and object descriptions, that is, a theoretically extensible taxonomy, potentially provides theoretical continuities across areas of perception. Evidence for the taxonomy's validity, or psychological meaningfulness, comes from differential usage of its components in (1) describing familiar and stranger target persons, (2) for physical versus indepth descriptive purposes, and (3) over the stages of the descriptive output. Descriptions of friends focus relatively more on personality traits and personal origins, while descriptions of strangers focus on context. Physical descriptions not surprisingly emphasize appearance, while indepth descriptions include mostly personality traits, as well as observable behaviors, appearance terms, and relationship descriptors. Differential usage of the components over stages of the description reveals that descriptions usually begin with appearance and later include typical behaviors and personality terms. Relationship labels, when used, occur at the beginning. Parallels with object description are discussed, and structural implications for concept storage are explored.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985204861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985204861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00619.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00619.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84985204861
SN - 0022-3506
VL - 47
SP - 136
EP - 161
JO - Journal of Personality
JF - Journal of Personality
IS - 1
ER -