Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Permanent magnets for ELM suppression in tokamaks: feasibility and operational compatibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Permanent magnets can provide static magnetic fields without power supplies or feed lines, offering a simpler alternative to conventional electromagnets in tokamaks. This work examines permanent magnet arrays (PMAs) for edge localized mode (ELM) control in double-null (DN) configurations, where traditional RMP coils exhibit limited effectiveness. Linear plasma response calculations using IPEC assess high-field-side (HFS) permanent magnet placement, benchmarking performance against DIII-D low-field-side (LFS) internal coils (I-coils) while evaluating engineering constraints. Modeling results demonstrate that HFS permanent magnet configurations generate HFS plasma response amplitudes more than 5 times larger than conventional I-coil systems. While other resonant response metrics show comparable or reduced response relative to I-coils, the combination of conventional RMP systems and permanent magnets is expected to provide enhanced performance. Operational impact assessments of persistent magnetic fields, including sideband field effects and startup/ramp-up compatibility, reveal acceptable performance within established operational boundaries. This analysis establishes PMAs as a technically viable approach for DN ELM control with reductions in system complexity, motivating further experimental validation on existing tokamak facilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNuclear Fusion
Volume66
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2026

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Keywords

  • 3D magnetic perturbation
  • double-null configuration
  • ELM suppression
  • permanent magnets
  • startup and ramp-up
  • tokamak

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Permanent magnets for ELM suppression in tokamaks: feasibility and operational compatibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this