TY - GEN
T1 - Performance modeling of aeroderivative steam-injected gas turbines and combined cycles fueled from fixed or fluid-bed biomass gasifiers
AU - Larson, Eric D.
AU - Hughes, Wendy E.M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 1996 by ASME.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - First-generation biomass integrated-gasifier/gas turbine (BIG/CT) technology, based on combined cycles and fluid-bed gasifiers, is likely to be commercially ready by the turn of the century, with ten or more commercially-oriented demonstration projects presently ongoing worldwide. In development and demonstration efforts to date, relatively little attention has been given to alternative cycle configurations or gasifier designs. Performance modeling is described here for steam-injected and combined cycle systems built around gas turbines resembling the GE LM2500, with fuel delivered from integrated fluid- or fixed-bed gasifiers. Some features of fixed-bed gasification appear to offer benefits, particularly for steam-injected cycles. A primary motivation for examining steam injection is expected capital cost savings compared to combined cycles, especially at total power plant capacities below 100 MW, (due to scale economies associated with steam bottoming cycles). Because of the inherently dispersed nature of biomass production, first-generation BIG/CT applications in the sub-100 MW, range will be common.
AB - First-generation biomass integrated-gasifier/gas turbine (BIG/CT) technology, based on combined cycles and fluid-bed gasifiers, is likely to be commercially ready by the turn of the century, with ten or more commercially-oriented demonstration projects presently ongoing worldwide. In development and demonstration efforts to date, relatively little attention has been given to alternative cycle configurations or gasifier designs. Performance modeling is described here for steam-injected and combined cycle systems built around gas turbines resembling the GE LM2500, with fuel delivered from integrated fluid- or fixed-bed gasifiers. Some features of fixed-bed gasification appear to offer benefits, particularly for steam-injected cycles. A primary motivation for examining steam injection is expected capital cost savings compared to combined cycles, especially at total power plant capacities below 100 MW, (due to scale economies associated with steam bottoming cycles). Because of the inherently dispersed nature of biomass production, first-generation BIG/CT applications in the sub-100 MW, range will be common.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923950782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923950782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/96-GT-089
DO - 10.1115/96-GT-089
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84923950782
T3 - ASME 1996 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, GT 1996
BT - Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations
PB - Web Portal ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)
T2 - ASME 1996 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, GT 1996
Y2 - 10 June 1996 through 13 June 1996
ER -