TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceiving the Powerful
T2 - Intriguing Individuals versus Threatening Groups
AU - Dépret, Eric
AU - Fiske, Susan T.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research and the first author were supported by NIMH Grant 41801 to the second author. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Susan T. Fiske, Department of Psychology, Tobin Hall, Box 37710, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst MA 01003-7710. E-mail: [email protected].
PY - 1999/9
Y1 - 1999/9
N2 - An experiment investigated the effect of short-term asymmetrical outcome dependency (one form of power) on person perception in interpersonal and intergroup situations. Power was manipulated as the amount of control targets had over perceivers' outcomes. In the interpersonal condition, targets were from various out-group categories, so they formed a loose aggregate. In the intergroup condition, targets all were from the same out-group category, forming a homogeneous out-group. The hypothesis, contrasting the impact of power in interpersonal and intergroup relations, was confirmed. Results show that, in the interpersonal condition only, targets' power (perceiver outcome dependency) led to individuating impression-formation processes (attention and dispositional inferences), consistent with the continuum model of impression formation. By contrast, in the intergroup condition, targets' power did not lead to individuating impression-formation processes, but generated in-group identification and favoritism, as well as negative affect, an apparent in-group cohesion effect under threat. Results are discussed with regard to the continuum model of impression formation, issues of control deprivation, and social identity theory.
AB - An experiment investigated the effect of short-term asymmetrical outcome dependency (one form of power) on person perception in interpersonal and intergroup situations. Power was manipulated as the amount of control targets had over perceivers' outcomes. In the interpersonal condition, targets were from various out-group categories, so they formed a loose aggregate. In the intergroup condition, targets all were from the same out-group category, forming a homogeneous out-group. The hypothesis, contrasting the impact of power in interpersonal and intergroup relations, was confirmed. Results show that, in the interpersonal condition only, targets' power (perceiver outcome dependency) led to individuating impression-formation processes (attention and dispositional inferences), consistent with the continuum model of impression formation. By contrast, in the intergroup condition, targets' power did not lead to individuating impression-formation processes, but generated in-group identification and favoritism, as well as negative affect, an apparent in-group cohesion effect under threat. Results are discussed with regard to the continuum model of impression formation, issues of control deprivation, and social identity theory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043206674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043206674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jesp.1999.1380
DO - 10.1006/jesp.1999.1380
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0043206674
SN - 0022-1031
VL - 35
SP - 461
EP - 480
JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
IS - 5
ER -