Abstract
We demonstrate that an oft-used indirect attitude assessment technique-the attitude activation paradigm-accurately assesses attitudes only when participants attend to the prime stimuli during the attitude activation task. Attitude activation attitudes toward obviously valenced words (e.g., torture, liberty) were more sensitive to attitude valence and extremity when participants were required to attend to the prime words than when they attended to a competing stimulus. As a result, we observed a significantly stronger correlation between attitude activation attitudes and a direct, self-report attitude measure when participants attended to the primes than when they ignored them. We conclude that failing to require participants to attend to the primes during the attitude activation task results in a flawed measurement, which could lead researchers to underestimate relations between the attitude activation measure and direct, self-report attitude measures.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 784-791 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 2006 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Affective priming
- Attitude activation
- Attitude measurement
- Automatic evaluation
- Bona fide pipeline
- Evaluative priming
- Implicit attitudes
- Indirect measurement