Abstract
Situated at the meeting points of Law and Medicine, the "judicialization of the right to health" is a contested and hotly debated phenomenon in Brazil. While government officials and some scholars argue that it is driven by urban elites and private interests, and used primarily to access high-cost drugs, empirical evidence refute narratives depicting judicialization as a harbinger of inequity and an antagonist of the public health system. This article's quantitative and ethnographic analysis suggests, instead, that low- -income people are working through the available legal mechanisms to claim access to medical technologies and care, turning the Judiciary into a critical site of biopolitics from below. These patient-citizen-consumers are no longer waiting for medical technologies to trickle down, and judicialization has become a key instrument to hold the State accountable for workable infrastructures.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 77-105 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Lua Nova |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 98 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Biopolitics from below
- Critical global health
- Judicialization of health
- Patient-Citizen-Consumers
- Pharmaceuticalization
- State accountability
- Workable infrastructures