Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Orbital Decay Candidates Reconsidered: WASP-4 b Is Not Decaying and Kepler-1658 b Is Not a Planet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The fate of hot Jupiters is thought to be engulfment by their host stars, the outcome of tidal orbital decay. Transit timing has revealed a few systems with apparently shrinking orbital periods, but such signals can be mimicked by light travel-time effects (LTTE) of a distant companion. By combining transit timings with precise radial-velocity data, including new data, we reassessed three reported cases of orbital decay: WASP-4, WASP-12, and Kepler-1658. For WASP-4, the period change is best explained by LTTE due to an ≈7 M Jup companion at ≈8 au, with no need to invoke orbital decay. For WASP-12, in contrast, the data firmly exclude LTTE and confirm genuine orbital decay. For Kepler-1658, spectroscopic and photometric anomalies reveal the “planet” to be an eclipsing K/M binary bound to the F-type primary, with LTTE explaining the observed period change. Thus, among the known hot Jupiters, only WASP-12 b currently shows compelling evidence for orbital decay.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number300
JournalPlanetary Science Journal
Volume6
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2025

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Orbital Decay Candidates Reconsidered: WASP-4 b Is Not Decaying and Kepler-1658 b Is Not a Planet'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this