Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment

Adam Wolf, William R.L. Anderegg, Stephen Wilson Pacala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For over 40 y the dominant theory of stomatal behavior has been that plants should open stomates until the carbon gained by an infinitesimal additional opening balances the additional water lost times a water price that is constant at least over short periods. This theory has persisted because of its remarkable success in explaining strongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for over 40 y that the theory is not consistent with competition among plants for water. We develop an alternative theory in which plants maximize carbon gain without pricing water loss and also add two features to both this and the classical theory, which are strongly supported by empirical evidence: (i) water flow through xylem that is progressively impaired as xylem water potential drops and (ii) fitness or carbon costs associated with low water potentials caused by a variety of mechanisms, including xylem damage repair. We show that our alternative carbon-maximization optimization is consistent with plant competition because it yields an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS)-species with the ESS stomatal behavior that will outcompete all others. We further show that, like the classical theory, the alternative theory also explains the functional forms of empirical stomatal models. We derive ways to test between the alternative optimization criteria by introducing a metric-the marginal xylem tension efficiency, which quantifies the amount of photosynthesis a plant will forego from opening stomatal an infinitesimal amount more to avoid a drop in water potential.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E7222-E7230
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume113
Issue number46
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2016

Fingerprint

Xylem
Water
Carbon
Costs and Cost Analysis
Photosynthesis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Keywords

  • Biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks
  • Carbon cycle
  • Embolism
  • Hydraulic vulnerability

Cite this

@article{8a7a0bbea28e46ddacce7af8cb3c3261,
title = "Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment",
abstract = "For over 40 y the dominant theory of stomatal behavior has been that plants should open stomates until the carbon gained by an infinitesimal additional opening balances the additional water lost times a water price that is constant at least over short periods. This theory has persisted because of its remarkable success in explaining strongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for over 40 y that the theory is not consistent with competition among plants for water. We develop an alternative theory in which plants maximize carbon gain without pricing water loss and also add two features to both this and the classical theory, which are strongly supported by empirical evidence: (i) water flow through xylem that is progressively impaired as xylem water potential drops and (ii) fitness or carbon costs associated with low water potentials caused by a variety of mechanisms, including xylem damage repair. We show that our alternative carbon-maximization optimization is consistent with plant competition because it yields an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS)-species with the ESS stomatal behavior that will outcompete all others. We further show that, like the classical theory, the alternative theory also explains the functional forms of empirical stomatal models. We derive ways to test between the alternative optimization criteria by introducing a metric-the marginal xylem tension efficiency, which quantifies the amount of photosynthesis a plant will forego from opening stomatal an infinitesimal amount more to avoid a drop in water potential.",
keywords = "Biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks, Carbon cycle, Embolism, Hydraulic vulnerability",
author = "Adam Wolf and Anderegg, {William R.L.} and Pacala, {Stephen Wilson}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1615144113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "E7222--E7230",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "46",

}

Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment. / Wolf, Adam; Anderegg, William R.L.; Pacala, Stephen Wilson.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 113, No. 46, 15.11.2016, p. E7222-E7230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment

AU - Wolf, Adam

AU - Anderegg, William R.L.

AU - Pacala, Stephen Wilson

PY - 2016/11/15

Y1 - 2016/11/15

N2 - For over 40 y the dominant theory of stomatal behavior has been that plants should open stomates until the carbon gained by an infinitesimal additional opening balances the additional water lost times a water price that is constant at least over short periods. This theory has persisted because of its remarkable success in explaining strongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for over 40 y that the theory is not consistent with competition among plants for water. We develop an alternative theory in which plants maximize carbon gain without pricing water loss and also add two features to both this and the classical theory, which are strongly supported by empirical evidence: (i) water flow through xylem that is progressively impaired as xylem water potential drops and (ii) fitness or carbon costs associated with low water potentials caused by a variety of mechanisms, including xylem damage repair. We show that our alternative carbon-maximization optimization is consistent with plant competition because it yields an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS)-species with the ESS stomatal behavior that will outcompete all others. We further show that, like the classical theory, the alternative theory also explains the functional forms of empirical stomatal models. We derive ways to test between the alternative optimization criteria by introducing a metric-the marginal xylem tension efficiency, which quantifies the amount of photosynthesis a plant will forego from opening stomatal an infinitesimal amount more to avoid a drop in water potential.

AB - For over 40 y the dominant theory of stomatal behavior has been that plants should open stomates until the carbon gained by an infinitesimal additional opening balances the additional water lost times a water price that is constant at least over short periods. This theory has persisted because of its remarkable success in explaining strongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for over 40 y that the theory is not consistent with competition among plants for water. We develop an alternative theory in which plants maximize carbon gain without pricing water loss and also add two features to both this and the classical theory, which are strongly supported by empirical evidence: (i) water flow through xylem that is progressively impaired as xylem water potential drops and (ii) fitness or carbon costs associated with low water potentials caused by a variety of mechanisms, including xylem damage repair. We show that our alternative carbon-maximization optimization is consistent with plant competition because it yields an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS)-species with the ESS stomatal behavior that will outcompete all others. We further show that, like the classical theory, the alternative theory also explains the functional forms of empirical stomatal models. We derive ways to test between the alternative optimization criteria by introducing a metric-the marginal xylem tension efficiency, which quantifies the amount of photosynthesis a plant will forego from opening stomatal an infinitesimal amount more to avoid a drop in water potential.

KW - Biosphere-atmosphere feedbacks

KW - Carbon cycle

KW - Embolism

KW - Hydraulic vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995584136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995584136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1615144113

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1615144113

M3 - Article

C2 - 27799540

AN - SCOPUS:84995584136

VL - 113

SP - E7222-E7230

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 46

ER -