Abstract
Forward-looking agents care about expected future utility flows, and hence have higher current felicity if they are optimistic. This paper studies utility-based biases in beliefs by supposing that beliefs maximize average felicity, optimally balancing this benefit of optimism against the costs of worse decision making. A small optimistic bias in beliefs typically leads to first-order gains in anticipatory utility and only second-order costs in realized outcomes. In a portfolio choice example, investors overestimate their return and exhibit a preference for skewness; in general equilibrium, investors' prior beliefs are endogenously heterogeneous. In a consumption-saving example, consumers are both overconfident and overoptimistic.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1092-1118 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | American Economic Review |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2005 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics