Opacity in agreement

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, I use a complex pattern of agreement in progressives in the NeoAramaic language Senaya as a window into the timing of and relationship among the different components of ^-agreement. In particular, I argue that we need to recognize three distinct, ordered operations underlying what we see on the surface as ^-agreement - Match, Value, and Vocabulary Insertion - based on data that reveal that opacity can arise both in the relation between Match and Value, as well as in the relation between Value and Vocabulary Insertion. This work builds on and extends earlier research that recognizes the need for (at least a subset of) these distinct components, including (among many others) Halle & Marantz (1993; 1994), Béjar (2003), Arregi & Nevins (2012), Bhatt & Walkow (2013), Bonet (2013), and Marušič et al. (2015).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAgree to Agree
Subtitle of host publicationAgreement in the Minimalist Programme
PublisherLanguage Science Press
Pages149-177
Number of pages29
ISBN (Electronic)9783961102143
ISBN (Print)9783961102150
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 14 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opacity in agreement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this