TY - GEN
T1 - On the relative de-anonymizability of graph data
T2 - 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE INFOCOM 2016
AU - Ji, Shouling
AU - Li, Weiqing
AU - Yang, Shukun
AU - Mittal, Prateek
AU - Beyah, Raheem
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/7/27
Y1 - 2016/7/27
N2 - In this paper, we propose a structural importance-aware approach to quantify the vulnerability/de-anonymizability of graph data to structure-based De-Anonymization (DA) attacks [1][2][3][4]. Specifically, we quantify both the seed-based and the seed-free Relative De-anonymizability (RD) of graph data for both perfect DA (successfully de-anonymizing all the target users) and partial DA (where some DA error is tolerated) under a general data model. In our relative quantification, instead of treating all the users in graph data as structurally equivalent, we adaptively quantify their RD in terms of their structural importance. Leveraging 15 real world graph datasets, we validate the accuracy of our relative quantifications and compare them with state-of-the-art seed-based and seed-free quantification techniques. The results demonstrate that our structural importance-aware relative quantifications are more sound and precise when measuring graph data's real vulnerability/de-anonymizability.
AB - In this paper, we propose a structural importance-aware approach to quantify the vulnerability/de-anonymizability of graph data to structure-based De-Anonymization (DA) attacks [1][2][3][4]. Specifically, we quantify both the seed-based and the seed-free Relative De-anonymizability (RD) of graph data for both perfect DA (successfully de-anonymizing all the target users) and partial DA (where some DA error is tolerated) under a general data model. In our relative quantification, instead of treating all the users in graph data as structurally equivalent, we adaptively quantify their RD in terms of their structural importance. Leveraging 15 real world graph datasets, we validate the accuracy of our relative quantifications and compare them with state-of-the-art seed-based and seed-free quantification techniques. The results demonstrate that our structural importance-aware relative quantifications are more sound and precise when measuring graph data's real vulnerability/de-anonymizability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983243145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983243145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/INFOCOM.2016.7524585
DO - 10.1109/INFOCOM.2016.7524585
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84983243145
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE INFOCOM
BT - IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 10 April 2016 through 14 April 2016
ER -