Abstract
The problem of finding large cliques in random graphs and its “planted” variant, where one wants to recover a clique of size ω log (n) added to an Erdős-Rényi graph G ∼ G(n,1 2 ), have been intensely studied. Nevertheless, existing polynomial time algorithms can only recover planted cliques of size ω = Ω(n). By contrast, information theoretically, one can recover planted cliques so long as ω log (n). In this work, we continue the investigation of algorithms from the Sum of Squares hierarchy for solving the planted clique problem begun by Meka, Potechin, and Wigderson [2] and Deshpande and Montanari [25]. Our main result is that degree four SoS does not recover the planted clique unless ω n/ polylog n, improving on the bound ω n1/3 due to Reference [25]. An argument of Kelner shows that the this result cannot be proved using the same certificate as prior works. Rather, our proof involves constructing and analyzing a new certificate that yields the nearly tight lower bound by “correcting” the certificate of References [2, 25, 27].
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 28 |
| Journal | ACM Transactions on Algorithms |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Keywords
- Planted clique
- Random matrices
- Sum of Squares method
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the integrality gap of degree-4 sum of squares for planted clique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver